|
||||
[Chameleon-dev] [Bug 92] New: [Chameleon] - preparation for 1.1 betabugzilla-daemon@www.maptools.org bugzilla-daemon@www.maptools.orgTue, 4 Nov 2003 09:53:24 -0500
|
http://www.maptools.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92 Summary: [Chameleon] - preparation for 1.1 beta Product: Chameleon Version: 1.1 Platform: All OS/Version: All Status: NEW Severity: major Priority: P1 Component: Core AssignedTo: chameleon-dev@lists.maptools.org ReportedBy: spencer@dmsolutions.ca All, I would like to start chameleon onto a release cycle with the intention of getting version 1.1 released by Christmas or early in the new year. We have a lot of interest in chameleon right now and I think delaying a release will only hurt us in the long run. That being said, the purpose of this bug is to track the tasks required to get a Beta release of Chameleon 1.1. My intention with a Beta release is to: 1. freeze changes to the core of chameleon. 2. identify widget groups and their status (beta, alpha, development) with respect to chameleon 1.1 3. thorough review and QA on the chameleon core and base widget groups (those that are considered part of the chameleon package) With this in mind, I need feedback from the chameleon developers on outstanding features that need to be implemented. AFAIK, the list is: * Sacha to implement support for handling widgets in multiple forms * Paul to implement complete buttonizer/button support in widget.php, including non-javascript mode for buttons * Darren/Sacha/Paul to redo widget documentation architecture (already in bug 74) Once these (at least the first two) items are complete (and any others that get added), I would like to do a code review of the chameleon core components, including: * chameleon.php (522 lines) * UIManager.php (427 lines) * WidgetManager.php (183 lines) * TemplateParser.php (248 lines) * Widget.php (925 lines) As part of this, I would also like to review the current contents of the configuration files for chameleon and validate all the items there. This represents a fair amount of code, and could take quite a while to thoroughly review. I think this is an important step, though. Once this is done, I think we can move to a beta status and then begin to use bugzilla extensively to report and track remaining issues for a full release. Comments are welcome. Also, who should be on the code review and when should we do it? ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.
This archive was generated by Pipermail. |
MapTools.org -- Hosted by DM Solutions Group |