|
||||
[Chameleon-dev] [Bug 133] New: [Chameleon]CWCJSAPI Widget or SharedResource?bugzilla-daemon@www.maptools.org bugzilla-daemon@www.maptools.orgTue, 18 Nov 2003 14:53:56 -0500
|
http://www.maptools.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=133 Summary: [Chameleon]CWCJSAPI Widget or SharedResource? Product: Chameleon Version: 1.1 Platform: PC OS/Version: Windows 2000 Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: Widget AssignedTo: chameleon-dev@lists.maptools.org ReportedBy: thorne@dmsolutions.ca Can we really say in our documents that the CWCJSAPI is actually a widget? I perssonnelly feel that this feature (extension) to Chameleon cannot be described as a widget as it is in the Widget Docs. When reading the CWC2JavascriptAPI.html document it suggests that it is a major enhancement and extension to the Core of Chameleon. The difference is that this CWCJSAPI can be turned on or off by adding the <CWC2 TYPE="SharedResource" NAME="CWCJSAPI"/> & <CWC2 Type="CWCJSAPI" DEBUG="False"/> to a template. Even the tags themselves do not seem to make sense to me, from a users point of view. Here is what I suggest, that no longer should the CWCJSAPI be defined as a WIDGET but rather a "Shared Resource" for all potential Widgets. This will mean that we can remove the Widget tag and place the DEBUG parameter within the Shared Resources. He is what it may look like: <CWC2 TYPE="SharedResource" NAME="CWCJSAPI"> DEBUG="[True|False"] </CWC2> These changes should be reflected in the documentation. But first There should be a Shared Resources Doc or Section. ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.
This archive was generated by Pipermail. |
MapTools.org -- Hosted by DM Solutions Group |