[Chameleon] Chameleon 1.99 Beta 2 - CWC default context not r
ecognized
Delfos, Jacob
jacob.delfos at maunsell.com
Sun Aug 1 20:15:13 EDT 2004
Jeff
Yes, they are definitely set. I copied my configuration from my previous CWC
setup (1.0.4). I copied it 1 parameter at a time, it should all be correct.
However, I do not have any indication it is accessing the cwc2.xml file at
all, because if I temporarily remove it, I get the same error. Should the
directory structure remain as it is given in the beta2 zip file? This means
that the config directory is at the same level as the CWC2 directory (as
opposed to inside the htdocs directory). Also, should the htdocs directory
be as empty as it is, or was I supposed to move all files around to make it
similar to the old-style setup?
Regards,
Jacob
-----Original Message-----
From: Jeff McKenna [mailto:jmckenna at dmsolutions.ca]
Sent: Friday, 30 July 2004 10:47 PM
To: Delfos, Jacob
Cc: chameleon at lists.maptools.org
Subject: Re: [Chameleon] Chameleon 1.99 Beta 2 - CWC default context not r
ecognized
Can u verify that in cwc2.xml that you have the following paths set
correctly?:
<context-param>
<param-name>default_context</param-name>
<param-value>world_context.xml</param-value>
<description>Default map context to load when starting this
application</description>
</context-param>
<context-param>
<param-name>context_root</param-name>
<param-value>/ms4w/apps/chameleon/cwc2/contexts/</param-value>
<description>Absolute root path to context files. All context
should be in that folder (or sub folder).</description>
</context-param>
jeff
Delfos, Jacob wrote:
> When I configure the CWC instance to use a default context and template, I
> still get this error:
>
> request URI was http://auper1pc364/cwcepra/cwc2.php
> query string was service=VCG&request=GetApplication&version=0.1.0
> Invalid request. No CONTEXTS parameter was provided and the Service
Instance
> has no default context
>
> I'm using the same templates as for the normal chameleon, and my setup is
> exactly similar to the one I use for CWC 1.0.4 (which works).
>
> Jacob
>
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: chameleon-bounces at lists.maptools.org
> [mailto:chameleon-bounces at lists.maptools.org] On Behalf Of Paul Spencer
> Sent: Thursday, 29 July 2004 3:15 AM
> To: Ken Sanderson
> Cc: chameleon at lists.maptools.org
> Subject: Re: [Chameleon] Chameleon 1.99 Beta 2
>
>
> Ken ...
>
> Ken Sanderson wrote:
>
>
>>Just installing the new version and had a couple general questions.
>>
>>The description of CWC2 says it allows for the creation of a chameleon
>>application without a local install. Can someone give me an example of
>>when you might use this? Are there limits on who can use CWC2 once you
>>have it setup? I assume that my server would be doing the work of the
>>other remote applications?
>
>
> You would want to do this if you:
>
> * only want to set up only one server
> * you want to allow other organizations to run apps without installing
> anything
> * rapid application development
> * centralized management
>
> ... and probably other reasons too
>
> There are some limits you can place, either through the configuration
> files or through appropriate limitations in your web server.
>
> In the configuration files, you can choose to allow or deny access to
> remote contexts and templates. If you deny access, you effectively
> limit them to only templates and contexts hosted on the server. You
> should also limit the "root" of the context and template files.
>
> You can also restrict access with a .htaccess file (or IIS equivalent?)
>
> Your server would be doing all the work.
>
>
>>Do we need to install the CWC2, or is it optional? I know the folder is
>>there, but if you don't want to use this feature do you need to go
>>through the installation regardless? I noticed a few errors in the
>>samples that I didn't have before, but I havent done the CWC2 install
>>yet and wondering if that's the likely cause?
>
>
> CWC2 is completely optional. It is distributed with Chameleon but is
> only available if you actively configure it to be so. Note that the
> MS4W version does come with it enabled.
>
> I highly doubt that CWC2 would break the samples. They are broken all
> by themselves :)
>
> Paul
>
>
>
>>Thanks,
>>
>>Ken
>>Miistakis
>>
>>
>>_______________________________________________
>>Chameleon mailing list
>>Chameleon at lists.maptools.org
>>http://lists.maptools.org/mailman/listinfo/chameleon
>>
>
>
--
Jeff McKenna
GIS Specialist
DM Solutions Group Inc.
http://www.dmsolutions.ca
More information about the Chameleon
mailing list