|
||||
[Chameleon] mousemove and CPUPaul Spencer spencer@dmsolutions.caMon, 12 Jan 2004 08:37:24 -0500
|
Bart, these tools just exagerate the existing problem. The fix, I hope, is to provide the mouse handling through a single interface provided by the map image, and things like GetMousePosition will only be done once rather than for every widget that tracks mouse movement. I am also toying with the idea of only having a single tool active on the map to further reduce the amount of javascript that has to be run within the event handler. Cheers, Paul Bart van den Eijnden wrote: > Hi Paul, > > I have the feeling this is especially the case when the ROI tool is in > the application. I have 2 applications, one with the ROI Rectangle tool, > and one without. And for the application with the ROI tool, the mouse > movement is really slower/taking more CPU than in the application > without the ROI tool. > > Also when doing some profiling with Venkman in Mozilla (great tool BTW) > the ROI mousemove functions are among the most heavy ones. > > Function Name: ROIRectToolGetMousePosition (Lines 1148 - 1188) > Total Calls: 114 (max recurse 0) > Total Time: 761.09 (min/max/avg 10.01/10.02/6.68) > > > Function Name: ROIRectToolMouseMove (Lines 1190 - 1211) > Total Calls: 114 (max recurse 0) > Total Time: 761.09 (min/max/avg 10.01/10.02/6.68) > > Best regards, > Bart > > On Thu, 08 Jan 2004 16:31:21 -0500, Paul Spencer <pagameba@magma.ca> wrote: > >> Bart, >> >> we are (hopefully) going to be looking into this issue with JF Doyon >> and NRCan. The current mechanism is to attach to the onmousemove >> event handler of the document object. We are proposing to replace >> this with an event handler on the map image (or layer or whatever >> works in most DOMs) with backwards compatibility to use the existing >> mechanism. This requires some rework since all the move movement >> handling is done in slightly different ways and I would like to >> consolidate this into one centralized handling function. >> >> As to why it happens over the document and not the map image, I have >> no clue! Any hints on this would be great. >> >> Cheers, >> >> Paul >> >> Bart van den Eijnden wrote: >> >>> Hi list, >>> >>> I have been looking a little bit into the CPU usage of a Chameleon >>> application and see that the things that occur on the mouse move >>> event take a lot of CPU (50-100% depending on the speed of movement). >>> Perhaps some of these functions could be on intervals which are more >>> friendly to the CPU usage? >>> >>> Also, I noticed that this does not only occur when moving over the >>> map area, but this occurs when moving over any part of the page. >>> That's quite strange, because no coordinates etc. need to be updated >>> when moving the mouse around outside the map area. >>> >>> Best regards, >>> Bart _______________________________________________ >>> Chameleon mailing list >>> Chameleon@lists.maptools.org >>> http://lists.maptools.org/mailman/listinfo/chameleon >>> >> > > > -- ----------------------------------------------------------------- |Paul Spencer spencer@dmsolutions.ca | |-----------------------------------------------------------------| |Applications & Software Development | |DM Solutions Group Inc http://www.dmsolutions.ca/| -----------------------------------------------------------------
This archive was generated by Pipermail. |
MapTools.org -- Hosted by DM Solutions Group |