[Chameleon] ExtentHistory compareEntries()
Paul Spencer
pspencer at dmsolutions.ca
Thu Nov 24 13:28:52 EST 2005
Joanne,
if you can come up with a way to use the tolerance in the evaluation
in a reasonable way, please file a bug and we'll put your code in.
Cheers
Paul
On 23-Nov-05, at 11:34 AM, McGraw, Joanne wrote:
> Hello all,
>
> In ExtentHistory's compareEntries(), the tolerance 0.005 is being
> used to evaluate whether or not there is a difference in the width
> and height but is not being used to limit differences between the
> various min/max extents. Should it be?
>
> In a scenario I can duplicate, compareEntries() is comparing the
> two extents shown at the bottom of this email, considering them
> unequal and, therefore, adding another extents entry to the stack.
> Another extents entry that is the exact same as the one before it,
> but the code considers them different because it is evaluating the
> difference between the minx of $e1 and $e2 as:
>
> 0.00000000488944351673 - 0.00000000325962901115 =
> 0.00000000162981450558
>
> That value is really just the result of rounding errors in the math
> to get those two values. A more complete showing of the numbers
> that got me to them is below.
>
> So, should the tolerance be used to evaluate the differences
> between the coordinates, as well as for the width and height? I
> assume yes, simply because comparisons of real numbers are usually
> limited by a tolerance of some kind, even if it's just 0.001
> (depending on your numbers' precision). If this should be entered
> as a bug or if anyone is aware of why no tolerance is being used in
> the evaluation, let me know.
>
> Cheers,
> jtm
>
>
> These first four are showing the values held in the identified
> element for the $e1 and then the $e2 extent arrays:
>
> [23-Nov-2005 10:45:08] 0 1177671.43072 = 1177671.43072
> [23-Nov-2005 10:45:08] 1 6299760.16495 = 6299760.16495
> [23-Nov-2005 10:45:08] 2 1364643.55198 = 1364643.55198
> [23-Nov-2005 10:45:08] 3 6392540.6704 = 6392540.6704
>
> These are basically showing the results of the math to get to the
> point where the minx is being evaluated as different:
>
> [23-Nov-2005 10:45:08] w1 = 186972.121257; w2 = 186972.121257; abs
> (w1 - w2) = 3.25962901115E-009; abs(w1 - w2)/w2 =
> 1.74337702821E-014; pw = 1.74337702821E-014; tolerance = 0.005
> [23-Nov-2005 10:45:08] h1 = 92780.5054541; h2 = 92780.5054541; abs
> (h1 - h2) = 1.86264514923E-009; abs(h1 - h2)/h2 =
> 2.00758245508E-014; ph = 2.00758245508E-014; tolerance = 0.005
> [23-Nov-2005 10:45:08] e1[0] = 1177671.43072; e2[0] =
> 1177671.43072; abs(e1[0] - e2[0]) = 4.88944351673E-009; w1 * pw =
> 3.25962901115E-009
> [23-Nov-2005 10:45:08] minx = 4.88944351673E-009 > 3.25962901115E-009
> [23-Nov-2005 10:45:08] returning false
>
>
> Joanne T. McGraw
> GIS Data Analyst / Analyste des données du SIG
> Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada / Agriculture et Agroalimentaire
> Canada
> Telephone/Téléphone: (613) 759-6103
> Facsimile/Télécopieur: (613) 759-1937
> 960 Carling Ave, #1136
> Ottawa, Ontario
> K1A 0C6
>
> mcgrawj at agr.gc.ca
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Chameleon mailing list
> Chameleon at lists.maptools.org
> http://lists.maptools.org/mailman/listinfo/chameleon
+-----------------------------------------------------------------+
|Paul Spencer pspencer at dmsolutions.ca |
+-----------------------------------------------------------------+
|Applications & Software Development |
|DM Solutions Group Inc http://www.dmsolutions.ca/|
+-----------------------------------------------------------------+
More information about the Chameleon
mailing list