[FGS] OpenEV Question

[Frank Warmerdam]

Tyler Mitchell wrote:
> On Thursday 08 July 2004 22:48, Frank Warmerdam wrote:
> 
>>To make psycopg available as part of FGS, I think it should be included
>>in the lib/python2.3/site-packages directory of the Python FGS package.
>>If you wanted to make it useful within OpenEV in some manner you could
>>write a "tool" and dump that in the share/openev/tools directory.  But
>>you would need to consider how you wanted it to interact within OpenEV.
> 
> 
> I was also thinking of making these  a sort of sub-package, modules packages 
> for Python that install using fgsinstall too.  That way we don't have to 
> bloat it up too much for those who don't care about certain pieces.  Even if 
> we want to end up throwing them until the default python package, it at least 
> makes my setup of it a bit more compartimentalized.

Tyler,

Well, I think there is a balance to be achieved between consolodating software
into packages for simplicity and splitting things to reduce bloat.  For python
that will be your call, but if we start having FGS packages that are less than
1MB then I think they would be candidates for consolodation if there is a logical
way to consolodate.

Best regards,
-- 
---------------------------------------+--------------------------------------
I set the clouds in motion - turn up   | Frank Warmerdam, warmerdam at pobox.com
light and sound - activate the windows | http://pobox.com/~warmerdam
and watch the world go round - Rush    | Geospatial Programmer for Rent