[ka-Map-users] About ka-Map's performance when group mor e than 30
Paul Spencer
pspencer at dmsolutions.ca
Fri Jun 9 07:19:35 EDT 2006
If all visible layers are in one group, then you are at the minimum
resource usage already (one set of tiles in the cache, one set of
images loaded to client). If you want to increase flexibility (layer
ordering), you would normally do so at an extra cost of cache space
and images loaded to the client. You could possibly avoid the extra
cache space by choosing not to cache tiles of certain layers (see the
wiki for details) but this will reduce overall performance because
uncached tiles have to be generated every page load.
This is a limitation of using this type of mapping engine, or at
least I can't think of a way to get more flexibility without
sacrificing client performance, server performance, and/or disk cache
size.
Cheers
Paul
On 8-Jun-06, at 9:30 PM, 王磊 wrote:
>
> Thanks for your reply.I have changed the group method to layer
> method,so visible layers merge into one group.The speed is well,But
> the cache may be too huge and the control of layer sequence also
> need much more cache. Can you suggest some good ideas about this??
>
>
> --70家品牌旗舰店开张!
> --http://sms.eyou.com
> --无忧二二族、足球大富翁...尽在亿邮短信
> _______________________________________________
> ka-Map-users mailing list
> ka-Map-users at lists.maptools.org
> http://lists.maptools.org/mailman/listinfo/ka-map-users
+-----------------------------------------------------------------+
|Paul Spencer pspencer at dmsolutions.ca |
+-----------------------------------------------------------------+
|Applications & Software Development |
|DM Solutions Group Inc http://www.dmsolutions.ca/|
+-----------------------------------------------------------------+
More information about the ka-Map-users
mailing list