[ka-Map-users] releases

[Paul Spencer]

sorry, I just had a few minutes to deal with email.  I'm not working  
on ka-Map this weekend (perhaps a bit on Sunday)

Cheers

Paul

On 24-Jun-06, at 11:47 AM, Lorenzo Becchi wrote:

> Hi Paul,
> I'm on IRC now.
>
> If you have a minute it would be nice to share some opinions now as  
> it seems we'll both gonna work on ka-map this week end.
>
> ;-)
>
>
> we can talk of next meeting, what feature has to be completed  
> first, ecc.
> everybody is invited.
>
>
> see you later
> Lorenzo
>
>
>
>
> On 24/giu/06, at 17:39, Paul Spencer wrote:
>
>> Lorenzo,
>>
>> perhaps you are right and we could just discuss this on the  
>> mailing list, but I find it takes a lot longer to resolve minor  
>> issues by email than on IRC.  I was hoping an hour on IRC would  
>> get us further ahead than several days of emails.
>>
>> I think the t-shirts and mugs may become collectors items :)  Who  
>> knows, maybe we are making some people very rich by keeping this  
>> stuff scarce!
>>
>> I do need to have a look at your code (even though I do trust  
>> you :)) and try it out.
>>
>> I am also very keen to fix how the caching is done, right now it  
>> is causing me some pain!  I'm gonna work on that first.
>>
>> Cheers
>>
>> Paul
>>
>> On 23-Jun-06, at 9:00 AM, Lorenzo Becchi wrote:
>>
>>>> Lorenzo,
>>>>
>>> Hi Paul,
>>>
>>>> I think this is a very good idea.
>>>
>>> ok
>>>
>>>> The fact that the API is not so user friendly is what the whole  
>>>> OpenLayers thing is about.  Unless something drastic happens, I  
>>>> feel that the move to OpenLayers is something that people are  
>>>> not opposed to (just cautious) so it seems unlikely that I will  
>>>> do anything significant to the API.  I was originally planning  
>>>> to refactor the API as part of a 1.0 release.
>>>
>>>
>>> That was my idea too. But it seems that we can plan to finish  
>>> actual API history with a ka-map version 1.0 just to publish all  
>>> effort we did in the last year.
>>> Than I'm more and more convinced that version 2 should be the  
>>> integration with OpenLayer and why not with other communities.
>>> Maybe we'll have to change the name if we try to enter osgeo  
>>> incubation so it would be nice to leave "all ka-map fans" with at  
>>> least a version 1.0
>>> think to person who bought t-shirts and mugs (at cafepress are  
>>> already cutting prices for the unclear future of ka-map!)
>>>  ;-)
>>>
>>> If you don't know what to do this week, there's documentation to  
>>> be done... or maybe you want to put your hands on the spaghetti  
>>> code we've posted lately.
>>>
>>>>
>>>> The developers need to make some decisions about what will make  
>>>> it into the 1.0 release.  Should we try to schedule an IRC  
>>>> meeting on #kamap to discuss?  I personally found the group  
>>>> discussion yesterday very useful.
>>>>
>>>
>>> Monday I can't. Tuesday? same hour?
>>> (1300 GMT aka 0900 EDT aka 1500 CET)
>>>
>>> Anyway we're not so many and we can reach the same result using  
>>> the list (I'm not sure...).
>>>
>>>> Cheers
>>>>
>>>> Paul
>>>
>>>
>>> Lorenzo
>>
>> +-----------------------------------------------------------------+
>> |Paul Spencer                           pspencer at dmsolutions.ca   |
>> +-----------------------------------------------------------------+
>> |Applications & Software Development                              |
>> |DM Solutions Group Inc                 http://www.dmsolutions.ca/|
>> +-----------------------------------------------------------------+
>>
>>
>>
>>
>

+-----------------------------------------------------------------+
|Paul Spencer                           pspencer at dmsolutions.ca   |
+-----------------------------------------------------------------+
|Applications & Software Development                              |
|DM Solutions Group Inc                 http://www.dmsolutions.ca/|
+-----------------------------------------------------------------+