[ka-Map-users] Thin web mapping clients comparison

[Lorenzo Becchi]

Hola GeoTux,
your comparison is cool.
thx

I would like to suggest some little changes for ka-Map:

1) supported data formats
you've wrote just shapefile and it's wrong. We support all formats that 
UMN Mapserver supports. So all formats that GDAL/OGR do.

2) Mapserver
you'll better write "UMN Mapserver" instead of "Mapserver". This is 
generally helpful for beginners.

3) supported geoservices
there are two levels of interaction with geoservices: one through 
mapserver that support WMS and WFS, and the other though the JS 
Interface that support, as you wrote, WMS and WFS (only points).

[OT] as Spanish speaking community I would like to invite you all of 
GeoTux to participate to OSGeo-es (http://es.osgeo.org)

ciao
lorenzo



GeoTux wrote:
> Good evening Ka-Map developers and users.
>
> We are the GeoTux team [1] and we present to you a thin web mapping 
> clients comparison [2]. Your project is there so we would like you to 
> visit it.
>
> We recently translate the comparison, the page is originally in spanish.
>
> Any suggestions are welcome.
>
> -----------------
> [1] http://geotux.tuxfamily.org <http://geotux.tuxfamily.org/>
> [2] 
> http://geotux.tuxfamily.org/index.php?option=com_myblog&show=comparaciF3n-de-clientes-ligeros-para-sig.html&Itemid=59&lang=en 
> <http://geotux.tuxfamily.org/index.php?option=com_myblog&show=comparaciF3n-de-clientes-ligeros-para-sig.html&Itemid=59&lang=en>
>
>
>
> -- 
> -----------
>   |\__  
> (:>__)(
>   |/    
>
> Soluciones Geoinformáticas Libres
> http://geotux.tuxfamily.org/
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> _______________________________________________
> ka-Map-users mailing list
> ka-Map-users at lists.maptools.org
> http://lists.maptools.org/mailman/listinfo/ka-map-users
>