<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.01 Transitional//EN">
<html>
<head>
<meta content="text/html;charset=ISO-8859-1" http-equiv="Content-Type">
<title></title>
</head>
<body bgcolor="#ffffff" text="#000000">
<pre>Hi Daniel,
Our production servers run windows, and I have a demo running on them see how it holds
up.
In the early versions of Ka-Map I ran into major issues, because Internet Explorer
seemed configured by default to send all requests to the server concurrently, which
caused IE and our Apache server to die with only 1 visitor.
Hence my apprehension of using it as a production site :)
This has mostly been solved because invisible layers are no longer loaded, reducing the
number of requests.
We have a sort of demo-site with a visitor counter (posted on
<a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="http://ka-map.ominiverdi.org/wiki/index.php/Links_to_some_ka-Map_applications">http://ka-map.ominiverdi.org/wiki/index.php/Links_to_some_ka-Map_applications</a>), to see
whether a limited number of visitors causes any issues. So far so good :)
I am now tempted to put up a production site when an opportunity comes along. But I'd like
to upgrade to faster harddisks, because I suspect Apache isn't as stable on Windows under
a piling number of PHP requests. Perhaps using a DSO approach would fix this, by reducing
the number of processes.....
regards,
Jacob
Hardware: PIV, 3.2GHz, 1GB RAM, SATA harddisk, PHP 5 (php-cgi)
Site: 2 RGB groups (JPEG compression), 4 vector groups (GIF compression).
</pre>
<blockquote>
<pre>
>> I got no responses to my question below from last week. Should I
>> conclude that nobody is using ka-Map in production with Windows servers?
>> Daniel</pre>
</blockquote>
</body>
</html>