[Mapserver-users] Re: [Bug 270] 24-bit image processing crash
Brent Fraser
bfraser@geoanalytic.com
Fri, 7 Feb 2003 08:14:11 -0700
Steve,
I think this can be solved with a note in the documentation. I had
discovered the issue while experimenting with HTML Legends with layers that
referenced 24-bit raster data.
The rule is: "Adding a CLASS section to a raster LAYER will cause the
raster to be classified."
Seems obvious to me now!
I doubt if anyone will want to classify a 24-bit raster using MapServer (as
Frank pointed out, the processing time could be significant).
Thanks!
Brent
----- Original Message -----
From: <bugzilla-daemon@lists.gis.umn.edu>
To: <bfraser@geoanalytic.com>
Sent: Thursday, February 06, 2003 6:57 PM
Subject: [Bug 270] 24-bit image processing crash
> http://mapserver.gis.umn.edu/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=270
>
> warmerdam@pobox.com changed:
>
> What |Removed |Added
> --------------------------------------------------------------------------
--
> AssignedTo|warmerdam@pobox.com
|steve.lime@dnr.state.mn.us
>
>
>
> ------- Additional Comments From warmerdam@pobox.com 2003-02-06
19:57 -------
> Steve,
>
> Brent mentions that he was using a CLASS with an RGB layer with
> the intention of producing a legend entry, but not really wanting to
> affect the way the layer looks. Currently if there are classes the
> raster code treats a layer quite differently.
>
> Do you have any thoughts on how Brent could generate a legend entry in
another
> way, or if there is some mechanism by which I should avoid treating the
layer
> as classified?
>
>
>
>
> ------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
> You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.
_______________________________________________
Mapserver-users mailing list
Mapserver-users@lists.gis.umn.edu
http://lists.gis.umn.edu/mailman/listinfo/mapserver-users