[MS4W-Users] SDE workgroup vs shapefile performance thoughts
Smith, Michael ERDC-CRREL-NH
Michael.Smith at usace.army.mil
Thu Dec 15 14:47:54 EST 2011
I don't know what you're backend is but I can report that Oracle Spatial works very well. We use it extensively.
ESRI has announced its intention to discontinue SDE in favor of its new SDS product (Spatial Data Server). I don't know that I would be planning on SDE long term
Remote Sensing/GIS Center
US Army Corps of Engineers
From: Mark Volz <MarkVolz at co.lyon.mn.us<mailto:MarkVolz at co.lyon.mn.us>>
Date: Thu, 15 Dec 2011 19:25:36 +0000
To: "ms4w-users at lists.maptools.org<mailto:ms4w-users at lists.maptools.org>" <ms4w-users at lists.maptools.org<mailto:ms4w-users at lists.maptools.org>>
Subject: [MS4W-Users] SDE workgroup vs shapefile performance thoughts
We are considering using SDE workgroup as a data source for Mapserver. Does anyone have any comments about the performance or usability of SDE Workgroup compared to shapefiles?
_______________________________________________ MS4W-Users mailing list MS4W-Users at lists.maptools.org<mailto:MS4W-Users at lists.maptools.org> http://lists.maptools.org/mailman/listinfo/ms4w-users
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the MS4W-Users