<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 3.2//EN">
<HTML>
<HEAD>
<META HTTP-EQUIV="Content-Type" CONTENT="text/html; charset=us-ascii">
<META NAME="Generator" CONTENT="MS Exchange Server version 6.5.7654.12">
<TITLE>gd/jpeg format</TITLE>
</HEAD>
<BODY>
<!-- Converted from text/rtf format -->
<P DIR=LTR><SPAN LANG="en-us"><FONT FACE="Calibri">Hello,</FONT></SPAN><SPAN LANG="en-us"></SPAN></P>
<P DIR=LTR><SPAN LANG="en-us"></SPAN></P>
<P DIR=LTR><SPAN LANG="en-us"><FONT FACE="Calibri">I was noticed on a mapserver post that</FONT></SPAN><SPAN LANG="en-us"> <FONT FACE="Calibri">gd/jpeg</FONT></SPAN><SPAN LANG="en-us"><FONT FACE="Calibri"> is no longer supported. For</FONT></SPAN><SPAN LANG="en-us"> <FONT FACE="Calibri">certain</FONT></SPAN><SPAN LANG="en-us"><FONT FACE="Calibri"></FONT></SPAN><SPAN LANG="en-us"> <FONT FACE="Calibri">data I like to use that format because 1) GD is quick and 2) jpeg is compressed so</FONT></SPAN><SPAN LANG="en-us"> <FONT FACE="Calibri">it’s a</FONT></SPAN><SPAN LANG="en-us"><FONT FACE="Calibri"> good web format.</FONT></SPAN><SPAN LANG="en-us"><FONT FACE="Calibri"> Are my assumptions about gd/jpeg wrong? Are there any current charts that</FONT></SPAN><SPAN LANG="en-us"> <FONT FACE="Calibri">test the different speeds between the map server format?</FONT></SPAN></P>
<P DIR=LTR><SPAN LANG="en-us"><FONT FACE="Calibri">Thanks</FONT></SPAN><SPAN LANG="en-us"></SPAN></P>
<P DIR=LTR><SPAN LANG="en-us"></SPAN></P>
<P DIR=LTR><SPAN LANG="en-us"></SPAN><SPAN LANG="en-us"></SPAN><SPAN LANG="en-us"><FONT FACE="Calibri">Mark Volz</FONT></SPAN></P>
<P DIR=LTR><SPAN LANG="en-us"><FONT FACE="Calibri">GIS Specialist</FONT></SPAN></P>
<P DIR=LTR><SPAN LANG="en-us"></SPAN></P>
</BODY>
</HTML>