[Proj] Re: Re: Discovery: libproj4 stmerc = French Gauss-Laborde
mkennedy2 at earthlink.net
Tue Jun 20 14:02:11 EDT 2006
Here's a website that does list the author as Dr. Wallis:
Yet another website mentioned that "international" prices were $22/doc, $100/code.
>Date: Mon, 19 Jun 2006 13:43:21 -0400
>From: "Gerald I. Evenden" <gerald.evenden at verizon.net>
>Subject: Re: [Proj] Re: Discovery: libproj4 stmerc = French
>To: "PROJ.4 and general Projections Discussions"
> <proj at lists.maptools.org>
>Message-ID: <200606191343.21728.gerald.evenden at verizon.net>
>On Monday 19 June 2006 12:59 pm, strebe at aol.com wrote:
>> I doubt the Open Channel Foundation source code has anything to do with
>> Wallis unless the program was written by someone else he communicated
>> with without his knowledge. Dr. Wallis has never tried to sell me
>> anything; never mentioned the existence of commercial source code; and
>> has communicated with me about his own implementation, including
>> algorithmic subtleties and requests for independent confirmation of
>> accuracy. He also considers the method to be "obvious" and not worth
>> publication on its own. On the other hand, either he believes he
>> originated the method, or else wanted me to believe he did.
>Sorry, my statement was only idle speculation because of the similarity of the
>subject and the fact Dr. Wallis promised to publish the code several years
>ago. It could have been an outlet for him and probably easier than going
>thought the pains of a professional publication---peer review, etc..
>> I can't say whether the product mentioned before came first, or whether
>> Dr. Wallis's method came first. I made Dr. Wallis's acquaintance in
>> 1996, and I know he had written his implementation years before that,
>> though I don't know how many. I'll contact him about the Open Channel
>> Foundation program.
>I did post a letter to Dr. Wallis a few days ago. I explained my interests
>and promised that I would not release any material related to his work
>without his prior permission. The reason for a letter was to communicate
>information related to libproj4 web site that is difficult to convey
>verbally. I hope he has not moved.
>> $61 for source code and documentation seems modest enough, but the
>> inane export restrictions won't help Mr. van Vlijmen. While I will not
>> supply source code, I'm happy to answer specific questions about
>> implementing the method.
>My objection to the ten bucks for the documentation reminds me of similar
>costs for NTIS material and only getting one or two pages of a totally
>worthless dissertation. If the source code is commercially useful than it is
>worth more than $50 but seems steep to me for just academic interest.
>Especially considering the amount and often high quality of material
>available on the net for nothing. There also seem to be chance of hidden
>strings to seeing the material that might compromise my being able to use and
>document derived material.
>Jerry and the low-riders: Daisy Mae and Joshua
>"Cogito cogito ergo cogito sum"
> Ambrose Bierce, The Devil's Dictionary
More information about the Proj