AUTOREPLY [Proj] Oscar van Vlijmen reply
jens.schwarz at alpstein.de
jens.schwarz at alpstein.de
Sun Aug 19 16:40:07 EDT 2007
Sehr geehrte Damen und Herren,
da ich mich bis einschließlich 24.08.07 im Urlaub befinde,
ist es mir leider nicht möglich Ihre e-mail persönlich zu beantworten.
Ab Montag,27.08.07 bin ich wieder im Büro und werde mich baldmöglichst
um Ihr Anliegen kümmern.
In dringenden Fällen wenden Sie sich bitte an meinen Kollegen, Herrn Martin Soutschek, unter martin.soutschek at alpstein.de
Vielen Dank für Ihr Verständnis.
Mit besten Grüßen aus Immenstadt
Jens Schwarz
Fachbereich Technologie & Produkte
Alpstein GmbH
Missener Str. 18
87509 Immenstadt
fon 08323-8006-0
fax 08323-8006-50
www.alpstein.de
info at alpstein.de
Oscar van Vlijmen quoted me:
Repeating the first paragraph from Michael's announcement: > This list¹s
main topic is solutions for co-ordinate transformations. But > this posting
isn¹t off-topic, because it¹s about co-ordinate transformations > too: I
claim that, for data maps in atlases, the transformation from the > map¹s X
& Y co-ordinates to the latitude/longitude co-ordinates should be > easy and
convenient for everyone, and I suggest a solution that I haven¹t > read
mentioned anywhere.
and then replied:
I can only comment: After 3 weeks of discussion I still haven't seen any
solution.
I comment:
The solution (to the need for more usable data maps) that I was referring to
there, the one that I haven’t seen mentioned anywhere, is the graduated
equidistant cylindrical, which has the linearly interpolable positions
property.
Other obvious solutions, also sharing the linearly interpolable positions
property, are the ordinary equidistant cylindrical, and the sinusoidal. I’ve
mentioned all three of those solutions on this list. I mentioned the
first two in my first posting.
.
Though the equidistant conic and graduated equidistant conic don’t have the
LIPP, they allow for easier lat/long determination than the projections
usually used for data maps. I mentioned those in my postings too, including
my first posting.
I emphasize that all of those were mentioned in my first posting (except for
the sinusoidal, which I suggested after Daan advocated the need for
equal-area for data maps.
Oscar continues:
Where are the equations or code for forward and inverse?
I comment:
I want to assure Oscar that the cylindrical equidistant, the graduated
equidistant cylindrical, and the sinusoidal are not mathematically difficult
to construct. He can find equations for the their construction and inverse
construction of the equidistant cylindrical and the sinusoidal in books that
cover such things.
The graduated equidistant cylindrical won’t be difficult either, since it
merely consists of the equidistant cylindrical, with different north-south
scale in different latitude bands.
I encourage Oscar to let me know if he has trouble constructing the
equidistant cylindrical, the graduated equidistant cylindrical, and the
sinusoidal.
I want to emphasize that very easy determination of X and Y map co-ordinates
from lat/long co-ordinates, and very easy determination of lat/long
co-ordinates from map X and Y co-ordinates are the whole point of the
projections that I’ve been suggesting for data maps.
Maybe Oscar is asking specifically about the graduated equidistant
cylindrical, since the ordinary equidistant cylindrical and the sinusoidal
are already well-described, an their equations of construction and inverse
construction are surely easy for anyone to find.
Let me repeat my clear definition of the graduated equidistant cylindrical
projection:
It is the equidistant cylindrical, but with different north-south scale in
different latitude bands. Each two consecutive parallels shown on the map
bound such a latitude band. In that latitude band, the north-south scale is
the geometric mean of the east-west scales along the two depicted parallels
that bound that latitude band.
Obviously something different must be done, on a world map, for the
northernmost and southernmost latitude bands, because obviously, like
Mercator, this projection can‘t show the poles.. As one way of dealing with
this, I suggest letting latitude 85 be the extreme poleward limit of a world
map on this projection, and the poleward bounding latitude of the most
poleward latitude bands. So the most extreme latitude bands would be from
latitude 80 to latitude 85. Obviously other ways of dealing with polar
regions could be suggested too.
Of course it won’t always be desired to show the Earth all the way from 85
south to 85 north.
[end of definition of the graduated equidistant cylindrical projection]
Oscar, let me know if you have trouble writing equations for the
construction and inverse construction of that projection, and I’ll help you
out.
Oscar continues:
If no one can come up with a practical solution, then for that reason the
discussion thread in this list should probably end.
I comment:
1. I have proposed practical solutions to the problem of finding projections
for more usable data maps.
2. Yes, the thread should probably end, since everything to be said on the
subject has been said--unless someone has a constructive suggestion.
Michael Ossipoff
_______________________________________________
Proj mailing list
Proj at lists.maptools.org
http://lists.maptools.org/mailman/listinfo/proj
More information about the Proj
mailing list