[Proj] Why use pj_inv() and pj_fwd() instead of pj_transform() ?
fabrice_martin2 at yahoo.fr
Sun Jun 3 06:33:18 EDT 2007
>pj_transform() is a newer function layered on pj_inv() and pj_fwd(). My
>intention is that most new applications would use it though there is
>some performance overhead to going through it instead of calling the
>pj_inv() and pj_fwd() functions directly.
Thank you for your answer. And could you tell me what's the rationale behind pj_inv() and pj_fwd() not taking into account prime meridians ? It could lead some people to prefer to substitute +lon_0 to +pm in coordinate systems' definitions, so that pj_inv(), pj_fwd() and pj_transform() give the same result !
Ne gardez plus qu'une seule adresse mail ! Copiez vos mails vers Yahoo! Mail
More information about the Proj