[Proj] Why use pj_inv() and pj_fwd() instead of pj_transform() ?

fabrice martin fabrice_martin2 at yahoo.fr
Sun Jun 3 15:19:14 EDT 2007

>The principle reason is that a prime meridian can easily be compensated for 
>with simple modification of the central meridian (+lon_0). 

that case, shouldn't EPSG definitions be modified, in order to use
+lon_0 instead of +pm ? For example, French Lambert projections are
defined with "+lon_0=0 +pm=paris". Wouldn't it be better to use simply
"+lon_0=2.33..." ? It would enable pj_inv, pj_fw and pj_transform to
return similar results.


Ne gardez plus qu'une seule adresse mail ! Copiez vos mails vers Yahoo! Mail 

More information about the Proj mailing list