[Proj] Regarding projection stmerc and Gause-Laborde
Gerald I. Evenden
geraldi.evenden at gmail.com
Mon Jun 23 12:49:35 EDT 2008
Some time ago someone claimed the stmerc and Gauss-Laborde were the same
projection but at the time I the only material I had on the Gauss-Laborde was
the NT/G 73 pdf. The math in '73 was not easy and the tables for testing
were obscure. Given lazyness and other pressures I abandoned varifying the
Recently Richard Didier offered his code for '73 for inclusion into libproj4
so this resurrected the question about stmerc. After doing a quick
conversion of the code into libproj4 format I did some checking and again the
messy tables of '73 confused things. Didier pointed to the definition of the
Reunion grid which I made into the following script:
# grid definition for L'lle de la Réunion from
RE="+ellps=intl +lon_0=55d32'E +lat_0=21d07'S +x_0=160000 +y_0=50000 +k_0=1.0"
lproj +proj=stmerc $RE -f %.4f <<EOF
where the test longitude and latitude are from the the lefthand column of the
table on page 3/3 of '73. The x-y results are:
which depart only by .1mm in the y axis.
It is interesting to compare the computational layout of stmerc as compared to
the documentation in NT/G 73. Because this projection is a standard
conformal double conversion of geographic coordinates of the ellipse to an
equivalent sphere followed by a conformal projection of the sphere the
forward code in stmerc looks like:
lp = proj_gauss(lp, P->en); // standard geographic -> sphere conversion
xy.x = P->aks0 * atanh(cos(lp.phi)*sin(lp.lam)); // standard sphere tmerc
xy.y = P->aks0 * (atan2(tan(lp.phi),cos(lp.lam)) - P->chi);
I will not go further into my issues with the NT/G series.
The whole religious complexion of the modern world is due
to the absence from Jerusalem of a lunatic asylum.
-- Havelock Ellis (1859-1939) British psychologist
More information about the Proj