[Proj] ntf_r93.gsb file corrupted

Cuinet Jérôme jerome at georezo.net
Thu Sep 24 16:53:47 EST 2009


I am also sure of that !

But could we validate a release until we are not sure that there is not 
regression ? A test-suite do tests the quicklest. Not to have a test-suite 
imply to do tests slowlier or not to do tests ?

Here, we have unix systems tests and tests disabled.

When I will use the product's project, I must donate, or I do as I could...

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Hamish" <hamish_b at yahoo.com>
To: "PROJ.4 and general Projections Discussions" <proj at lists.maptools.org>
Sent: Thursday, September 24, 2009 11:25 PM
Subject: Re: [Proj] ntf_r93.gsb file corrupted

Cuinet Jérôme wrote:
> Also, myself I do software with regressions. So I know how
> vicious are regressions. But the purpose of my comment is
> no-regressions **could** be mandatory. Today I don't depend
> on these software, so I can't work on these projects. But
> tomorrow I don't know and it is why I do this technological
> survey. And many people depends on them without knowing how
> to confirm released version.

I am sure that a donation to the project of a test-suite would
be most welcome.


Proj mailing list
Proj at lists.maptools.org

More information about the Proj mailing list