[Proj] rHEALPix new parameters
EMiller at dfg.ca.gov
Wed Oct 19 16:33:02 EST 2011
Did you have any thoughts on dealing with the minus zero problem in the test comparisons? I guess some compilers (Intel, others?) will print "-0.00" in some cases which causes the textual comparison to "0.00" to fail.
See the message from "brick <brickflying at gmail.com>" on 9/27.
Eric G. Miller
CA Dept. of Fish & Game
>>> On 10/19/2011 at 1:54 PM, Frank Warmerdam <warmerdam at pobox.com> wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 19, 2011 at 1:35 PM, Michael Speth
> <spethm at landcareresearch.co.nz> wrote:
>> How is the tv_out.dist file generated?
> The file is generated by running the script and renaming the
> output file after human review shows any diffs are due to newly
> added good results.
>> Also, does Proj.4 have any conventions for indicating that a given
>> set of parameters for a projection are invalid?
> I'm not sure how you mean. In the cs2cs output? In the code? In
> the docs?
> In the code for PJ_tmerc.c you can see how errors in +zone=
> values are reported with E_ERROR() during projection initialization.
> Best regards,
>> Thanks for your help!
>> On 18/10/11 15:41, Frank Warmerdam wrote:
>>> On Mon, Oct 17, 2011 at 7:00 PM, Michael Speth
>>> <spethm at landcareresearch.co.nz> wrote:
>>>> Thank you Frank!
>>>> I've added your recommended fixes and it works! We will now start
>>>> thoroughly testing. Do you have any suggestions for testing?
>>> Nothing deep, no. But I would like to have a few representative
>>> test points to incorporate into proj/nad/testvarious so you might
>>> want to consider including that in the submission patch.
>>> Best regards,
>> Michael Speth
>> Scientific Programmer
>> Landcare Research
>> Proj mailing list
>> Proj at lists.maptools.org
More information about the Proj