[Proj] Should we delete the legacy JNI wrapper (replaced by new ones)?
martin.desruisseaux at geomatys.fr
Fri Jun 1 06:57:43 EST 2012
Le 31/05/12 21:56, Frank Warmerdam a écrit :
>> Also, should we merge the JNI fixes to the 4.8 branch?
> Yes, I think that would be prudent.
Done. I merged the trunk from revisions 2190 to 2211 inclusive. Those
revision goes a little bit before the JNI fixes, since it contains the
following commit (which I presumed was intended to be in the 4.8 branch):
r2195 | warmerdam | 2012-03-13 23:47:22 +0100 (Mar 13 mar 2012) | 1 ligne
add some missing items of 4.8.0 news
This has the side effect of including also the following commit. I
presumed that it would not hurt, but we could revert that specific
commit if it shouldn't go to the 4.8 branch:
r2196 | warmerdam | 2012-03-14 02:27:57 +0100 (Mer 14 mar 2012) | 1 ligne
avoid using macro expansion directly in #include to simplify code
More information about the Proj