[Proj] Slightly off-topic: The phantom island that is real
Daniel Strebe
strebe at aol.com
Tue Nov 27 10:30:57 EST 2012
At 30_km x 6_km that would be one mighty aircraft carrier! Also, it shows up
on 19th century maps, same shape, which would makes it a doubly impressive
aircraft carrier.
Best,
--daan
-----Original message-----
From: support.mn at elisanet.fi
To: proj at lists.maptools.org
Sent: Tue, Nov 27, 2012 13:17:34 GMT+00:00
Subject: Re: [Proj] Slightly off-topic: The phantom island that is real
Hello,
well it might also be a hiding place for a military vessel ..
for example a large aircratft carrier ..
that would explain the reason why it time
to time disappears and comes back?
at least the "sand island" top view is very
much like an aircraft carrier? ;)
http://static.ddmcdn.com/gif/aircraft-carrier-top-view.gif
regards: Janne.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
-----------------------
strebe at aol.com kirjoitti:
>
> Joaquim: Thank you for the explanation. But I think all you have done is
confirm that the region is probably a large sand bar, sometimes submerged or
partially submerged. There seems to be two reasons data is so sparse there:
frequent cloud cover hindering remote sensing, and very shallow water that
makes soundings by ship impossible.
>
> Here is a representative sample of MODIS data that I culled from USGSs
Global Visualization Viewer:
> http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:MODIS-MCD43A4-02-2004.png
>
> The particular MODIS data set is MCD43A4 (MODIS/Terra+Aqua Nadir
BRDF-Adjusted Reflectance 16-Day L3 Global 500m SIN Grid). If you cycle
through the months and years, you can clearly see that MODIS usually sees
something there but sometimes does not. That means (to me) that sometimes
the sand bar is submerged too far for the satellite to detect it but usually
is shallow enough to yield a signal. None of the data are consistent with
deep water.
>
> Regards,
> daan Strebe
>
>
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: J. Luis <jmfluis at gmail.com>
> To: strebe <strebe at aol.com>
> Sent: Sat, Nov 24, 2012 6:36 am
> Subject: Re: [Proj] Slightly off-topic: The phantom island that is real
>
>
> Daan
>
> Although we never phrased it out in those mails, it's quite obvious
that what appears to an island in the SRTM+ is nothing but an
interpolation artifact introduced by a constrain imposed the coastline
itself. Notice how close the coastline and the 1 m meter contour lines
are. Furthermore the maximum height in the SRTM+ data is 1m meter, which
is obviously very suspicious. I'll add it also that the 'Walter' that
appears in one of those mails is Walter Smith from the Smith & Sandwell
bathymetry.
>
> HOWEVER, that does not rule out the possibility that the island
exists. Only says that there is no reliable data to constrain the grid
construction at that location. The 1400 m difference also puzzled me a
bit and moved by your mail I searched also the MODIS data for Sea Surface
Temperature ... and the mystery continues MODIS does not seam to find
water over there. See the image that I posted in GMT mailing list.
>
>
https://listserv.hawaii.edu/cgi-bin/wa?A2=ind1211&L=GMT-HELP&D=0&T=0&P=116217
>
> Regrads
>
> Joaquim
>
>
> I dont follow your assertion. The e-mail you cite states the
island DOES appear in GTOPO30 and SRM30+. I see the same
thing. When I look at the raw values in SRTM30 Plus, the
entire area of the island consists of sea-level DEM
values. Plus, NASA Blue Marble satellite imagery
clearly shows shallow water over the entire 30_km x
6_km area that is called Sandy Island on
innumerable maps.
>
> Whether or not there is an island there (as opposed to a
barely submerged sandbar) is perhaps open to
debate or depends on the tides. But the crew of the
research vessel is claiming 1,400_m soundings,
which just does
not coincide with that area at all.
>
>
>
>
> Regards,
> daan Strebe
>
>
>
>
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: J. Luis <jmfluis at gmail.com>
> To: PROJ.4 and general Projections Discussions
<proj at lists.maptools.org>
> Cc: strebe <strebe at aol.com>
> Sent: Fri, Nov 23, 2012 6:40 pm
> Subject: Re: [Proj] Slightly off-topic: The phantom island
that is real
>
>
> We discussed that on the GMT list too and no, the island
does NOT exist in the SRTM+ or GTOPO30 series
>
> See for example
>
https://listserv.hawaii.edu/cgi-bin/wa?A2=ind1211&L=GMT-HELP&D=0&T=0&P=107015
>
> Joaquim
>
>
> The crew of a research ship claims to have undiscovered a
large island in the South Pacifics Coral Sea near New
Caledonia, called Sandy Island. The news feeds have
picked up on this and its making its way around the
geeksphere with great rapidity. Here is an example article:
>
http://phys.org/news/2012-11-aussie-scientists-un-discover-pacific-island.htm
l
>
> However, it is quite clear from satellite imagery and
multiple data sources that the island in fact
exists, though possibly it is a barely submerged sandbar.
Yet the crew claims depths there are around 1,400 meters.
>
> Obviously the ship was not where they say it was. The
question is, how did the crew of this research vessel
convince themselves they were sailing in the same
area? I dont think a datum mismatch can account for this,
given the size of the sandbar.
>
> I have started a thread here:
>
http://mapthematics.com/forums/viewtopic.php?f=10&t=469
>
> Enjoy!
> daan Strebe
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Proj mailing list
> Proj at lists.maptools.org
> http://lists.maptools.org/mailman/listinfo/proj
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Proj mailing list
> Proj at lists.maptools.org
> http://lists.maptools.org/mailman/listinfo/proj
_______________________________________________
Proj mailing list
Proj at lists.maptools.org
http://lists.maptools.org/mailman/listinfo/proj
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.maptools.org/pipermail/proj/attachments/20121127/6f4d4eaa/attachment-0001.htm
More information about the Proj
mailing list