[Proj] Azimuthal Equidistant question

support.mn at elisanet.fi support.mn at elisanet.fi
Mon Oct 1 07:00:51 EST 2012


Hello,

without going any deep in your question ..

if you are far away from what is expected
you might need some additional parameters
to the projection setup... either lat_0, lon_0 needs
some initialization value or x_0 or y_0 is
missing something.. or some other parameter
with that projection .. if that does not help then
the projection might be wrong... etc. etc..

regards: Janne.

-------------------------------------------------------------

Joseph White [JWhite at terragotech.com] kirjoitti: 
> Hi, all,
> 
> I'm trying to track down an issue I'm seeing with Azimuthal Equidistant
> values when compared to ESRI.  The ESRI coordinate system I'm using is
> World Azimuthal Equidistant.  I'm using some sample data that is in the
> Tucson AZ area.
> 
>  
> 
> The coordinate strings we're passing into PROJ to set up the transform
> are:
> 
> Src: +proj=aeqd +lat_0=0 +lon_0=0  +x_0=0 +y_0=0 +datum=WGS84 +units=m
> +no_defs
> 
> Dest: +proj=longlat +datum=WGS84 +no_defs
> 
>  
> 
> I pass in the following coordinates (Easting,Northing):
> 
> 1.        -9939304, 6673447
> 
> 2.       -9930938, 6684888
> 
>  
> 
> I get this result:
> 
> 1.        -69d 0' 0.12", 32d 15' 14.159"
> 
> 2.       -68d 59' 24.215", 32d 19' 5.934"
> 
> Needless to say, this isn't anywhere near Tucson, and is about 31-32
> degrees off longitudinally.
> 
>  
> 
> When I try using a sphere (I've tried both semi major axis and
> equal-area), the values are much closer, but still off.  
> 
> Src: +proj=aeqd +lat_0=0 +lon_0=0  +x_0=0 +y_0=0 +a=6378137.0
> +b=6378137.0 +units=m +no_defs
> 
> Dest: +proj=longlat +a=6378137.0 +b=6378137.0 +no_defs
> 
>  
> 
> 1.        -110d 50' 50.416", 32d 6' 24.361"
> 
> 2.       -110d 51' 24.032", 32d 10' 15.985"
> 
>  
> 
> Src: +proj=aeqd +lat_0=0 +lon_0=0  +x_0=0 +y_0=0 +a=6371007.1809
> +b=6371007.1809 +units=m +no_defs
> 
> Dest: +proj=longlat +a=6371007.1809 +b=6371007.1809 +no_defs
> 
>  
> 
> 1.        -110d 59' 11.622", 32d 4' 58.135"
> 
> 2.       -110d 59' 45.523", 32d' 8' 49.575"
> 
>  
> 
> Does anyone out there have any idea why this is happening?  I'm at my
> wits end to explain it.
> 
>  
> 
> Thanks
> 
>  
> 
> Joe White
> 
>  
> 
>  
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Proj mailing list
> Proj at lists.maptools.org
> http://lists.maptools.org/mailman/listinfo/proj




More information about the Proj mailing list