[Proj] triaxial ellipsoid
Charles Karney
charles.karney at sri.com
Thu Oct 18 10:13:19 EST 2012
On 2012-10-17 11:25, Aleksander Yanovskiy wrote:
> Greetings!
>
> Could you please suggest me a software library that can calculate distances on the surface of the triaxial Earth ellipsoid ?
>
> Sincerely,
> Aleksander
The quick answer is "no", I know of no such library.
It might be worth digging a little into the issue, however...
For a geodesist, the issue has limited interest. A triaxial model of
the earth has major/minor equatorial axes of 6378137 +/- 35 meters (see
my E-mail "Analyzing the bumps in the EGM2008 geoid" to proj.4 on
2011-07-04). The EGM2008 geoid differs from the triaxial model by up to
+/- 70 m. Thus while an oblate ellipsoid is a lot better at
approximating the geoid than a sphere (cutting the errors from 2 km to
100m), the triaxial ellipsoid offers only a modest increase in fidelity
(100m to 70m) at a considerable cost (see next...).
For a mathematician, a triaxial ellipsoid is of considerable interest.
Geodesics on an oblate ellipsoid are "easy" (in mathematical terms)
because the rotational symmetry of the system allows you to reduce the
problem to quadrature. With triaxial ellipsoids the problem become a
*lot* harder (and therefore more interesting). There was considerable
excitement when Jacobi solved this problem with a "remarkable"
substitution, see
http://books.google.com/books?id=RbwGAAAAYAAJ&pg=PA309
http://books.google.com/books?id=Rh8GAAAAYAAJ&pg=RA1-PA267
If you google this problem you will see that this is still an active
area. Finally, I will note that Weierstrass treats the triaxial problem
in the geodetic context in
http://books.google.com/books?id=9O4GAAAAYAAJ&pg=PA257
But perhaps, that's just because his funding source was tied to military
objectives (and he was basically conning his sponsors)?
--
Charles Karney <charles.karney at sri.com>
SRI International, Princeton, NJ 08543-5300
Tel: +1 609 734 2312
Fax: +1 609 734 2662
More information about the Proj
mailing list