[Proj] Relationship between proj4 and spatialreference.org

Howard Butler hobu.inc at gmail.com
Wed Jan 2 09:12:51 EST 2013


Milo,

It is indeed waiting on a hands-on volunteer to invest some time in bringing it forward. Funding would be nice too, but developer time from someone familiar with Django, GDAL/OGR, and OpenLayers would make things go the farthest. Contact me privately if you're interested in getting the keys to the kingdom to do that work.

Howard

On Jan 2, 2013, at 5:52 AM, Milo van der Linden (gmail) <milovanderlinden at gmail.com> wrote:

> Is spatialreference.org waiting for funding or for "hands-on" volunteers? For the latter; I would gladly help.
> 
> 2012/12/31 Howard Butler <hobu.inc at gmail.com>
> 
> On Dec 31, 2012, at 7:13 AM, Jan Hartmann <j.l.h.hartmann at uva.nl> wrote:
> 
> > Can anyone tell me how the references at spatialreference.org are related to the proj-strings of the official proj library? Nowadays proj includes lots of WGS-84 shifts, and at least one of them (28992, Dutch RD) is not propagated to spatialreference.org.
> 
> The relationship to spatialreference.org is one of being simply out-of-date. sr.org has not been updated in quite a while, and it needs a champion to come along and bring things forward.  sr.org gets its definitions from proj.4/GDAL as well as GeoTools. These have not been refreshed in at least a couple of years -- time for more than one EPSG database drop and the inclusion of datum shifting description in proj.4.
> 
> Hope this helps,
> 
> Howard
> 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Proj mailing list
> Proj at lists.maptools.org
> http://lists.maptools.org/mailman/listinfo/proj
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Proj mailing list
> Proj at lists.maptools.org
> http://lists.maptools.org/mailman/listinfo/proj



More information about the Proj mailing list