[Proj] 4.9.1RC1 Released
even.rouault at spatialys.com
Sat Feb 21 10:19:33 EST 2015
Le samedi 21 février 2015 15:52:10, Charles Karney a écrit :
> On 02/21/2015 09:15 AM, Even Rouault wrote:
> > Le samedi 21 février 2015 14:18:22, Charles Karney a écrit :
> >> On 02/20/2015 10:48 PM, Howard Butler wrote:
> >>> As requested, I have issued one more RC, with the items from Markus,
> >>> Sebastiaan, and Charles. Please report any findings or issues as
> >>> before.
> >>> http://download.osgeo.org/proj/proj-4.9.1RC2.tar.gz
> >>> Thanks,
> >> Please apply the following patches to proj-4.9.1RC2 (in addition to
> >> including man/CMakeLists.txt and cmake/policies.cmake as noted by Even).
> >> These patches fix:
> > Applied. I had to manually apply since the patch got somehow corrupted in
> > the email. An attachment would have been better.
> > I blindly trust you for the cmake windows part...
> > One thing I noticed is that the set of installed headers isn't the same
> > between autoconf and cmake :
> > ../../install-proj-4.9.1-cmake/include/emess.h (should be internal only
> > no ?) ../../install-proj-4.9.1-cmake/include/proj_api.h
> > ../../install-proj-4.9.1-cmake/include/projects.h
> > ../../install-proj-4.9.1-cmake/include/pj_list.h (should be internal only
> > no ?) ../../install-proj-4.9.1-cmake/include/proj_config.h (should be
> > internal only no ?)
> > ../../install-proj-4.9.1-autoconf/include/proj_api.h
> > ../../install-proj-4.9.1-autoconf/include/org_proj4_Projections.h
> > (missing in cmake ?)
> > ../../install-proj-4.9.1-autoconf/include/projects.h
> > ../../install-proj-4.9.1-autoconf/include/geodesic.h (missing in cmake
> > ?) ../../install-proj-4.9.1-autoconf/include/org_proj4_PJ.h (missing in
> > cmake ?)
> Attached (!) is a patch to install the right headers (include geodesic.h
> exclude internal headers). The org_* headers aren't installed because
> JNI support is missing from cmake.
> I also added CH to be list of extra projections to be installed.
> One serious discrepancy is that the numbering of the so libraries.
> These are different between cmake and autoconf (and the cmake libraries
> have two sets of numbers!?). I'm not sure how best to handle this...
Me neither. For folks looking, here's the state of things :
$ find ../install-proj-4.9.1-autoconf/lib/
$ find ../install-proj-4.9.1-cmake/lib/
And for reference:
$ find ../install-proj-4.8.0/lib (autoconf build)
> Another less serious issue is that proj_api.h defines
> #define PJ_VERSION 491
> What's going to happen with 4.10.0? (I assume we won't want to go to
> I suggestion leaving this definition (for now at any rate), but
> #define PROJ_VERSION_MAJOR 4
> #define PROJ_VERSION_MINOR 9
> #define PROJ_VERSION_PATCH 1
> #define PROJ_VERSION_NUM(a,b,c) ((((a) * 10000 + (b)) * 100) + (c))
> #define PROJ_VERSION \
> PROJ_VERSION_NUM(PROJ_VERSION_MAJOR, PROJ_VERSION_MINOR,
Yes, that could do it. We did a similar trick when releasing GDAL 1.10. The
new numbering rule is still compatible with the older one (that is: newer
versions have PROJ_VERSION greater than the one of previous versions).
> Two other fixes to proj4 are on my list:
> (A) Fix the runtime library path for the executables with the cmake
> (B) Install cmake config support for proj (so that other cmake projects
> can find it with find_package(PROJ). On this point:
> (1) I plan to use PROJ4 as the package name (case is significant
> here). Any objections? Alternatives Proj4, proj4. Possibly the "4"
> should be left off and the user expected to do
> find_package (PROJ 4)
> I don't feel very strongly about this. However, it will be important
> to stick with a single convention.
The pkgconfig name is proj. That let the door opened for proj 5
> (2) There's already a file in the distribution called
> This name is probably a bad idea since it will be matched by the
> find_package file lookup. How about if I rename it to
Sounds reasonable to me.
Spatialys - Geospatial professional services
More information about the Proj