<html>
<head>
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html;
charset=windows-1252">
</head>
<body text="#000000" bgcolor="#FFFFFF">
<div class="moz-cite-prefix">
<p>Hello all
</p>
<p>Le 31/05/2017 à 22:15, Even Rouault a écrit :
</p>
</div>
<blockquote type="cite" cite="mid:4416803.loihJjt2tq@even-i700">
<meta name="qrichtext" content="1">
<style type="text/css">
p, li { white-space: pre-wrap; }
</style>
<p style=" margin-top:0px; margin-bottom:0px; margin-left:0px; margin-right:0px; -qt-block-indent:0; text-indent:0px; -qt-user-state:0;">On jeudi 1 juin 2017 05:57:38 CEST Cameron Shorter wrote:</p>
<p>> Yes, MetaCRS was a project gathering all the Proj4 projects together.</p>
</blockquote>
<p>Actually, when the MetaCRS list started, one of its goals was to create a test suite that could be used by any map projection library. We now have the Geospatial integrity of geoscience software (GIGS) tests for such purpose (<a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="http://www.iogp.org/Geomatics/#gigs">http://www.iogp.org/Geomatics/#gigs</a>), but a question could be whether there is interest in making those tests more readily runnable.</p>
<p>
</p>
<blockquote type="cite" cite="mid:4416803.loihJjt2tq@even-i700">
<p style=" margin-top:0px; margin-bottom:0px; margin-left:0px; margin-right:0px; -qt-block-indent:0; text-indent:0px; -qt-user-state:0;">> However, it appears that proj4 is the only project in that grouping which is active?</p>
</blockquote>
<p>I noticed that some activity happen on Proj4J outside this group, on at least one fork created by a user on GitHub.</p>
<p>
</p>
<blockquote type="cite" cite="mid:4416803.loihJjt2tq@even-i700">
<p>- spatialreference.org: not maintained in years. <a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="http://epsg.io/">http://epsg.io/</a> would be a possible replacement</p>
</blockquote>
<p>Why not referencing the only official source instead, which is <a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="http://epsg-registry.org/">http://epsg-registry.org/</a> ? The non-conform definitions (because of difference in axis order and units of measurements) contribute to the confusion. If the intend is to be able to give a direct link to a specific EPSG code, this can also be done with the official registry with URL like below:</p>
<blockquote>
<p><a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="http://epsg-registry.org/?display=entity&urn=urn:ogc:def:crs:EPSG::27700">http://epsg-registry.org/?display=entity&urn=urn:ogc:def:crs:EPSG::27700</a></p>
</blockquote>
<p>Regards,
</p>
<p> Martin</p>
<p>
</p>
</body>
</html>