<div dir="ltr"><div>Hello Mateusz,<br></div><div><br></div>There was a somewhat related discussion about the next version number that started on Jun 22. Thread top link:<br><a href="http://lists.maptools.org/pipermail/proj/2017-June/007697.html">http://lists.maptools.org/pipermail/proj/2017-June/007697.html</a><br><div><br></div><div>I don't remember the outcome, but I don't think there was a consensus. The version number may reflect API changes that are backward compatible/incompatible.<br><br>Thanks,<br></div><div>Micah</div><div class="gmail_extra"><br><div class="gmail_quote">On Thu, Sep 28, 2017 at 4:00 PM, Mateusz Loskot <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:mateusz@loskot.net" target="_blank">mateusz@loskot.net</a>></span> wrote:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">Hi,<br>
<br>
TL;TR: Shouldn't the current master be at 4.9.3 plus 'one'?<br>
<br>
I'm very late to the party since PROJ.4 moved to GitHub and<br>
I also haven't been able to find any related posts in the archives,<br>
(apart from the talk about 4.10.0 as next), sorry I'm missing<br>
versioning/tagging policies.<br>
<br>
The current release is 4.9.3, it is tagged in the repo.<br>
<br>
But, in the master, the 'big four' still declares 4.9.3<br>
<br>
<a href="https://github.com/OSGeo/proj.4/blob/master/CMakeLists.txt#L34" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">https://github.com/OSGeo/proj.<wbr>4/blob/master/CMakeLists.txt#<wbr>L34</a><br>
<a href="https://github.com/OSGeo/proj.4/blob/master/configure.ac#L4" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">https://github.com/OSGeo/proj.<wbr>4/blob/master/configure.ac#L4</a><br>
<a href="https://github.com/OSGeo/proj.4/blob/master/proj.spec#L2" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">https://github.com/OSGeo/proj.<wbr>4/blob/master/proj.spec#L2</a><br>
<a href="https://github.com/OSGeo/proj.4/blob/master/src/proj_api.h#L43" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">https://github.com/OSGeo/proj.<wbr>4/blob/master/src/proj_api.h#<wbr>L43</a><br>
<br>
Isn't it confusing that the development head declares the same<br>
version as the released one?<br>
Shouldn't master be one step ahead?<br>
<br>
I'm not discussing what it should, 4.9.4 or 4.10.0, it doesn't<br>
really matter for development/unreleased branch, I think.<br>
<br>
Best regards,<br>
<span class="HOEnZb"><font color="#888888">--<br>
Mateusz Loskot, <a href="http://mateusz.loskot.net" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">http://mateusz.loskot.net</a><br>
______________________________<wbr>_________________<br>
Proj mailing list<br>
<a href="mailto:Proj@lists.maptools.org">Proj@lists.maptools.org</a><br>
<a href="http://lists.maptools.org/mailman/listinfo/proj" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">http://lists.maptools.org/<wbr>mailman/listinfo/proj</a><br>
</font></span></blockquote></div><br><div><br></div>
</div></div>