<html>
<head>
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8">
</head>
<body style="word-wrap: break-word; -webkit-nbsp-mode: space; line-break: after-white-space;" class="">
I am also on board with this. Certainly makes more sense than the current setup.
<div class="">Using the GDAL/MapServer PSC rules is a good idea - we don’t need to reinvent</div>
<div class="">the wheel.</div>
<div class=""><br class="">
</div>
<div class="">Forming a PROJ PSC is effectively breaking out of MetaCRS. The MetaCRS PSC</div>
<div class="">guidelines [0] does not cover that topic but a vote seems to be in order. To ensure</div>
<div class="">the formalities are kept. This would in all likelihood be the last vote for the MetaCRS</div>
<div class="">PCS.</div>
<div class=""><br class="">
</div>
<div class="">/Kristian</div>
<div class=""><br class="">
</div>
<div class="">[0] <a href="https://trac.osgeo.org/metacrs/wiki/PSCGuidelines" class="">https://trac.osgeo.org/metacrs/wiki/PSCGuidelines</a><br class="">
<div><br class="">
<blockquote type="cite" class="">
<div class="">On 31 May 2018, at 22:10, Even Rouault <<a href="mailto:even.rouault@spatialys.com" class="">even.rouault@spatialys.com</a>> wrote:</div>
<br class="Apple-interchange-newline">
<div class="">
<div class="">On jeudi 31 mai 2018 15:00:29 CEST Howard Butler wrote:<br class="">
<blockquote type="cite" class="">All,<br class="">
<br class="">
In the interest of self determination, I propose that PROJ form a PSC<br class="">
with the following membership:<br class="">
</blockquote>
<br class="">
+1 (of course voting in a bootstrapping phase is a bit tricky :-) )<br class="">
<br class="">
Actually the GDAL PSC rules are in<br class="">
<a href="https://trac.osgeo.org/gdal/wiki/rfc1_pmc" class="">https://trac.osgeo.org/gdal/wiki/rfc1_pmc</a><br class="">
<br class="">
And they are exactly the same as the MapServer ones in<br class="">
http://mapserver.org/development/rfc/ms-rfc-23.html<br class="">
<br class="">
Those governance rules have proved to be robust for the 2 projects (I believe <br class="">
a few others have taken inspiration from them too) for more than 10 years now.<br class="">
<br class="">
Even<br class="">
<br class="">
-- <br class="">
Spatialys - Geospatial professional services<br class="">
http://www.spatialys.com<br class="">
_______________________________________________<br class="">
Proj mailing list<br class="">
Proj@lists.maptools.org<br class="">
http://lists.maptools.org/mailman/listinfo/proj<br class="">
</div>
</div>
</blockquote>
</div>
<br class="">
</div>
</body>
</html>