[TinyOWS-users] Wrong HTTP request Method?

[Olivier Courtin]

On Sep 27, 2010, at 8:14 PM, Rahkonen Jukka wrote:

Hi Jukka,

> I made another try by sending the xml that I captured from TinyOWS  
> logfile with the demo request web application which comes with  
> Geoserver installation. As a result I got features from TinyOWS. So  
> perhaps the Cadcorp client creates a valid request but it messes up  
> with headers or something. I need to write some mail to Cadcorp next.

Yes TinyOWS check the headers send by client.

On this point we are not that strict as several clients (including CITE)
don't use the same headers values.
And i'm not that sure that WFS 1.0.0 specify it (in 1.1.0 they did)

So if you catch the headers used by CadCorp maybe we could add it too...


For information we already handle:
   - application/x-www-form-urlencoded	=> KVP (WFS 1.1.0)
   - text/xml							=> XML (WFS 1.1.0)
   - application/xml						=> XML (WFS 1.0.0 & CITE)
   - application/xml; charset=UTF-8		=> XML WFS 1.0.0 & CITE)
   - text/plain							=> XML WFS 1.0.0 & CITE)
   - text/xml, application/xml   			=> XML (Udig bug)

--
Olivier