[TinyOWS-users] Using <limits features

[Rahkonen Jukka]

Olivier Courtin wrote:
> 
> Jukka,
> 
> > I think I found the reason for my trouble.  "Limits 
> features" setting does work, but if user sends maxFeatures 
> with the request TinyOWS takes it. I think user maxFeatures 
> should be accepted only if it is smaller that the one 
> configured on the server side.
> 
> Yes, that's a point,
> 
> The spec don't said much which should take the precendence,
> but as a security concern, it's obvious, server one must.
> 
> Could you give a try with r603 ?

Yes, server maxFeatures takes precendence now r603. I will still keep r586 on the server because some adjustment between it and r590 turned the EPSG:3067 coorninates to have wrong order with WFS 1.1.0.

-Jukka-