[TinyOWS-users] Using <limits features
Jukka.Rahkonen at mmmtike.fi
Sun Aug 21 11:35:23 EST 2011
Olivier Courtin wrote:
> > I think I found the reason for my trouble. "Limits
> features" setting does work, but if user sends maxFeatures
> with the request TinyOWS takes it. I think user maxFeatures
> should be accepted only if it is smaller that the one
> configured on the server side.
> Yes, that's a point,
> The spec don't said much which should take the precendence,
> but as a security concern, it's obvious, server one must.
> Could you give a try with r603 ?
Yes, server maxFeatures takes precendence now r603. I will still keep r586 on the server because some adjustment between it and r590 turned the EPSG:3067 coorninates to have wrong order with WFS 1.1.0.
More information about the TinyOWS-users