[TinyOWS-users] Some difference between clients WFS.

[Rahkonen Jukka]

Hi,

Sorry, I do not quite understand but let's take an example. This is my layer

<layer retrievable="1"
     writable="1"
     ns_prefix="tows"
     ns_uri="http://www.tinyows.org/"
         name="france"
         title="French Administrative Sub Boundaries (IGN - GeoFLA Departements)" />

Service is at http://188.64.1.61/cgi-bin/tinyows.

Do you have troubles with Kosmo? For me it works OK.

-Jukka Rahkonen-
________________________________
Lähettäjä: tinyows-users-bounces at lists.maptools.org [tinyows-users-bounces at lists.maptools.org] käyttäjän Andrea Peri [aperi2007 at gmail.com] puolesta
Lähetetty: 3. syyskuuta 2011 20:07
Vastaanottaja: TinyOWS users discuss list
Aihe: [TinyOWS-users] Some difference between clients WFS.

Hi,
I have download and try-ed the Kosmo GIS and it wfs plugin.

Indeed the wfs plugin of kosmo seem more sophisticated of the wfs plugin of wgis.
But I found a little ingenuity.

Kosmo wfs client use the
layer ns_prefix as table-name.

qgis wfs plugin insted use the attribute "name"

 notice this because

In my test a put the real name of the table in "name" attribute and use a mnemonic identify in the ns_prefix.
The result is that qgis wfs plugin will show me the data, insteed
kosmo plugin give me an error.
Kosmo show the dtaa only if I put the real name of the table in the "ns_prefix" field.

I guess the right choice is that of qgis,
is this correct ?

Thx,

--
-----------------
Andrea Peri
. . . . . . . . .
qwerty àèìòù
-----------------