[Cartoweb-users] Shapefile size and speed DB or native?
brendwal at gmail.com
Wed May 2 18:15:55 EDT 2007
I have a 1 GB shapefile (yes, 1 GB!), as it is the footprints for ALL the
IKONOS satellite imagery for the entire world. Other than breaking up the
file, using the native shapefile in Cartoweb and querying it would probably
take a LONG time. Is storing this file in a PostgreSQL/PostGIS Spatial
database any faster? I understand you can index the file in the database
version to speed up searches etc., but is this file just way too big to
begin with no matter which method I use?
Anyone have experience with working with a shapefile this big and trying to
access it over Cartoweb? Or the speed difference using a spatial DB?
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the Cartoweb-users