[Chameleon] Yet another startup question
Bart van den Eijnden
bartvde at xs4all.nl
Mon Apr 19 16:59:42 EDT 2004
Hi Ken,
the way to go is 1.1 instead of 1.0.
1.1 has had several design improvements coming from 1.0 (service instance
approach in 1.0 versus application based approach in 1.1). But soon 1.99
is gonna be released, so if you have some time stick around and wait for
that one instead. 1.1 can work both with MAP files and Web Map Context
documents, but normally I end up using MAP files with CONNECTIONTYPE WMS
layers. This is pure a configuration type of choice, as you can always
load a context document into your application at runtime. So what I do is
serve my local data through WMS like you suggest.
Hope this helps.
Best regards,
Bart
On Mon, 19 Apr 2004 14:55:28 -0600, Ken Sanderson <ken at rockies.ca> wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I have been slowly working my way through a chameleon install. I have a
> Wiki install guide for 1.0.x on IIS/2000 that's fairly helpful, and a
> print of a handful of messages from this list to guide me on my way for
> 1.1. A question I am still debating is what chameleon to install 1.0.x
> or 1.1.
>
>> From what I have read if I am using a map file/local data I should be
> installing 1.1, however if I am working with WMS 1.0.x. What if I am
> working with both? I have some local data and I have other data I want
> to pull in as WMS from remote sites. Do I install both, or just 1.1? I
> could just serve up my local data as a WMS layer instead of accessing
> via a .map file if that makes life easier?
>
> Comments/Suggestions welcome.
>
> Thanks,
>
> Ken
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Chameleon mailing list
> Chameleon at lists.maptools.org
> http://lists.maptools.org/mailman/listinfo/chameleon
>
--
More information about the Chameleon
mailing list