[ka-Map-users] ka-Map and OpenLayers
Stephen Woodbridge
woodbri at swoodbridge.com
Wed Jun 21 12:28:02 EDT 2006
Hi Paul,
This is very interesting! I finally had a few minutes to skim over the
openlayers.org site (I probably did not do it justice and will read more
later).
I think Steve L. question of what is the benefit is a good one. I can
see a lot of work ahead for the developers to convert to prototype.js
that you might want to avoid, which is not a bad thing. Also combining
efforts might be good also.
I think the pain for existing users might be might be very high, and
ka-map might just end up forking and taking on a life of its own.
Is getting support for mapguide in ka-map play any part of the driver
for this?
In general, I think a lot of the effort that has been going into ka-map
is to make it more modular, which is a very good thing. It is also very
good that that this effort has been happening with new feature
development. I would hate for this to stop or even backup to get it
integrated into openlayers.
Do you have a sense for how long it would take to integrate and get back
to current functionality?
Do you have a sense for how long it would take to integrate prototype.js
into ka-map? or some other appropriate library?
The article the Aaron post leaves me a little concerned about using
prototype.js. Does this concern anyone else? How has openlayers dealt
with this problem.
Schuyler, thanks for your post, that answer a lot of additional questions.
-Steve
Paul Spencer wrote:
> Hello ka-Mappers!
>
> I had a very interesting discussion with the developers of OpenLayers, a
> javascript api for tiled maps. Turns out OpenLayers and ka-Map are very
> similar. We decided that it would be beneficial for both communities if
> we attempted to merge the projects. The purpose of this email is to
> present this idea to the ka-Map community in order to generate some
> discussion on the subject.
>
> OpenLayers is hosted at http://www.openlayers.org/. They have some very
> interesting objectives which I think are compatible with ka-Map. Take a
> look at their site.
>
> OpenLayers is written on top of prototype.js, which was one of the
> things I was planning to do with ka-Map in the next couple of weeks. It
> has a very nice looking architecture and the code base is very readable.
>
> It is lacking quite a few things that ka-Map has:
>
> * core tiling engine is very similar, but it is not quite as optimal
> (doesn't reuse images for instance)
>
> * overlay stuff is point/text only
>
> * lacking tools (layer controls, scale bar etc) and the windowing stuff
>
> * lacking query capability
>
> * tile caching
>
> * probably several other things I can't think of right now
>
> I think that there are some differences in how OpenLayers and ka-Map
> approach things, but I'm not entirely sure that they are significant.
>
> At this point, I am proposing to join the two projects into a single
> project. My desired approach would be to start with the OpenLayers code
> and start to bring over the parts of ka-Map that I(we) feel are missing.
>
> Please let me know what you think of this. And point out all the
> problems you can think of.
>
> Cheers
>
> Paul
>
> +-----------------------------------------------------------------+
> |Paul Spencer pspencer at dmsolutions.ca |
> +-----------------------------------------------------------------+
> |Applications & Software Development |
> |DM Solutions Group Inc http://www.dmsolutions.ca/|
> +-----------------------------------------------------------------+
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> ka-Map-users mailing list
> ka-Map-users at lists.maptools.org
> http://lists.maptools.org/mailman/listinfo/ka-map-users
>
More information about the ka-Map-users
mailing list