[ka-Map-users] Question about a kamap setup I'm about to do

[Clark Endrizzi]

Thanks, I'll check that out.

As for the processor and stuff I'm using imagery that takes up several gigs
in tiff files.  Once I don't use that things work fine.  Should it work fine
with this much data?

On 2/27/06, Paul Spencer < pspencer at dmsolutions.ca> wrote:
>
> Clark,
>
> one of the issues that may be affecting you is the size of the
> 'metatile' that is being created.  MapServer ends up drawing a much
> larger map that it normally would be asked to.  This has some
> definite implications for your configuration.  You can try reducing
> the tile size and/or reducing the number of tiles in a metatile to
> get the combined size down to something that mapserver can produce in
> a reasonable time.  For instance, try tile sizes of 200 x 200 and
> either 4x4 metaWidth/metaHeight and see if you get a bit more out of
> your dev server.  Note that is a pretty good machine for this type of
> stuff so I am a bit suprised.  Have you tried benchmarking
> performance with just mapserv cgi on that mapfile?  We've tried to
> keep the tile.php pretty lean but there could still be room for
> improvement.
>
> Cheers
>
> Paul
>
> On 27-Feb-06, at 11:16 AM, Clark Endrizzi wrote:
>
> > Hi all.
> >
> > I'm using KaMap to do some pretty intensive stuff, namely just very
> > large maps with a lot of labels and raster image layers.  My
> > development server, a pentium 4 3ghz, is pretty much dying trying
> > to produce the maps and while our production server (dual dual-core
> > optersons) is much faster but it also gets hit a lot harder (I was
> > going to have the production server be the mapping server too but
> > seeing how intensive this stuff is I'm reconsidering).   So I was
> > considering a dedicated mapserver (dual opteron), which would serve
> > both as our new development server and the mapping server to
> > provide our production server with the maps.  Currently I'm looking
> > at WMS as the connectivity, is that the best option?  The two
> > servers will be connected on a private lan so if there is a better
> > option let me know.
> >
> > Thanks in advance.  I'm only asking here because I imagine some of
> > you may have run into the same issues and since this all revolves
> > around getting kamap serving maps fast I wanted your input the most.
> >
> > --
> > Clark Endrizzi
> > _______________________________________________
> > ka-Map-users mailing list
> > ka-Map-users at lists.maptools.org
> > http://lists.maptools.org/mailman/listinfo/ka-map-users
>
> +-----------------------------------------------------------------+
> |Paul Spencer                           pspencer at dmsolutions.ca   |
> +-----------------------------------------------------------------+
> |Applications & Software Development                              |
> |DM Solutions Group Inc                 http://www.dmsolutions.ca/|<http://www.dmsolutions.ca/%7C>
> +-----------------------------------------------------------------+
>
>
>
>
>


--
Clark Endrizzi
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.maptools.org/pipermail/ka-map-users/attachments/20060302/9a070963/attachment.html