[ka-Map-users] Question about a kamap setup I'm about to do
Paul Spencer
pspencer at dmsolutions.ca
Thu Mar 2 22:02:05 EST 2006
Clark,
that *can* work fine but can also be horribly inefficient if not
properly optimized for use by mapserver.
If you have not already done so, I suggest you look into using
gdal_translate to rebuild the tiffs with internal tiling and use
gdal_addo to add overviews. This will help substantially. If you
have questions on these tools and how to use them correctly, please
use the mapserver-users list.
Cheers
Paul
On 2-Mar-06, at 10:09 AM, Clark Endrizzi wrote:
> Thanks, I'll check that out.
>
> As for the processor and stuff I'm using imagery that takes up
> several gigs in tiff files. Once I don't use that things work
> fine. Should it work fine with this much data?
>
> On 2/27/06, Paul Spencer < pspencer at dmsolutions.ca> wrote:Clark,
>
> one of the issues that may be affecting you is the size of the
> 'metatile' that is being created. MapServer ends up drawing a much
> larger map that it normally would be asked to. This has some
> definite implications for your configuration. You can try reducing
> the tile size and/or reducing the number of tiles in a metatile to
> get the combined size down to something that mapserver can produce in
> a reasonable time. For instance, try tile sizes of 200 x 200 and
> either 4x4 metaWidth/metaHeight and see if you get a bit more out of
> your dev server. Note that is a pretty good machine for this type of
> stuff so I am a bit suprised. Have you tried benchmarking
> performance with just mapserv cgi on that mapfile? We've tried to
> keep the tile.php pretty lean but there could still be room for
> improvement.
>
> Cheers
>
> Paul
>
> On 27-Feb-06, at 11:16 AM, Clark Endrizzi wrote:
>
> > Hi all.
> >
> > I'm using KaMap to do some pretty intensive stuff, namely just very
> > large maps with a lot of labels and raster image layers. My
> > development server, a pentium 4 3ghz, is pretty much dying trying
> > to produce the maps and while our production server (dual dual-core
> > optersons) is much faster but it also gets hit a lot harder (I was
> > going to have the production server be the mapping server too but
> > seeing how intensive this stuff is I'm reconsidering). So I was
> > considering a dedicated mapserver (dual opteron), which would serve
> > both as our new development server and the mapping server to
> > provide our production server with the maps. Currently I'm looking
> > at WMS as the connectivity, is that the best option? The two
> > servers will be connected on a private lan so if there is a better
> > option let me know.
> >
> > Thanks in advance. I'm only asking here because I imagine some of
> > you may have run into the same issues and since this all revolves
> > around getting kamap serving maps fast I wanted your input the most.
> >
> > --
> > Clark Endrizzi
> > _______________________________________________
> > ka-Map-users mailing list
> > ka-Map-users at lists.maptools.org
> > http://lists.maptools.org/mailman/listinfo/ka-map-users
>
> +-----------------------------------------------------------------+
> |Paul Spencer pspencer at dmsolutions.ca |
> +-----------------------------------------------------------------+
> |Applications & Software Development |
> |DM Solutions Group Inc http://www.dmsolutions.ca/|
> +-----------------------------------------------------------------+
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> --
> Clark Endrizzi
> _______________________________________________
> ka-Map-users mailing list
> ka-Map-users at lists.maptools.org
> http://lists.maptools.org/mailman/listinfo/ka-map-users
+-----------------------------------------------------------------+
|Paul Spencer pspencer at dmsolutions.ca |
+-----------------------------------------------------------------+
|Applications & Software Development |
|DM Solutions Group Inc http://www.dmsolutions.ca/|
+-----------------------------------------------------------------+
More information about the ka-Map-users
mailing list