[ka-Map-users] Thin web mapping clients comparison

[Lorenzo Becchi]

GeoTux wrote:
>
>
> Thanks by the invitation Lorenzo, this is a great community. Do you 
> think we can discuss issues like this comparison there?
>

please, yes!
there's another group working on a similar thread

saludos
Lorenzo



> Saludos.
>
> GeoTux
>
> 2009/1/14 Lorenzo Becchi <lorenzo at ominiverdi.com 
> <mailto:lorenzo at ominiverdi.com>>
>
>     Hola GeoTux,
>     your comparison is cool.
>     thx
>
>     I would like to suggest some little changes for ka-Map:
>
>     1) supported data formats
>     you've wrote just shapefile and it's wrong. We support all formats
>     that
>     UMN Mapserver supports. So all formats that GDAL/OGR do.
>
>     2) Mapserver
>     you'll better write "UMN Mapserver" instead of "Mapserver". This is
>     generally helpful for beginners.
>
>     3) supported geoservices
>     there are two levels of interaction with geoservices: one through
>     mapserver that support WMS and WFS, and the other though the JS
>     Interface that support, as you wrote, WMS and WFS (only points).
>
>     [OT] as Spanish speaking community I would like to invite you all of
>     GeoTux to participate to OSGeo-es (http://es.osgeo.org)
>
>     ciao
>     lorenzo
>
>
>
>     GeoTux wrote:
>     > Good evening Ka-Map developers and users.
>     >
>     > We are the GeoTux team [1] and we present to you a thin web mapping
>     > clients comparison [2]. Your project is there so we would like
>     you to
>     > visit it.
>     >
>     > We recently translate the comparison, the page is originally in
>     spanish.
>     >
>     > Any suggestions are welcome.
>     >
>     > -----------------
>     > [1] http://geotux.tuxfamily.org <http://geotux.tuxfamily.org/>
>     > [2]
>     >
>     http://geotux.tuxfamily.org/index.php?option=com_myblog&show=comparaciF3n-de-clientes-ligeros-para-sig.html&Itemid=59&lang=en
>     <http://geotux.tuxfamily.org/index.php?option=com_myblog&show=comparaciF3n-de-clientes-ligeros-para-sig.html&Itemid=59&lang=en>
>     >
>     <http://geotux.tuxfamily.org/index.php?option=com_myblog&show=comparaciF3n-de-clientes-ligeros-para-sig.html&Itemid=59&lang=en
>     <http://geotux.tuxfamily.org/index.php?option=com_myblog&show=comparaciF3n-de-clientes-ligeros-para-sig.html&Itemid=59&lang=en>>
>     >
>     >
>     >
>     > --
>     > -----------
>     >   |\__
>     > (:>__)(
>     >   |/
>     >
>     > Soluciones Geoinformáticas Libres
>     > http://geotux.tuxfamily.org/
>     >
>     ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>     >
>     > _______________________________________________
>     > ka-Map-users mailing list
>     > ka-Map-users at lists.maptools.org
>     <mailto:ka-Map-users at lists.maptools.org>
>     > http://lists.maptools.org/mailman/listinfo/ka-map-users
>     >
>     _______________________________________________
>     ka-Map-users mailing list
>     ka-Map-users at lists.maptools.org
>     <mailto:ka-Map-users at lists.maptools.org>
>     http://lists.maptools.org/mailman/listinfo/ka-map-users
>
>
>
>
> -- 
> -----------
>   |\__  
> (:>__)(
>   |/    
>
> Soluciones Geoinformáticas Libres
> http://geotux.tuxfamily.org/