[MS4W-Users] gd/jpeg format

[Yewondwossen Assefa]

Hi mark,

I beleive gd/jpeg is no more. Was it really faster anyway? I have not 
seen recent tests on rendering speed but I would also be curious to see 
if it really did make a difference. I belive personally that agg/jpeg 
would be good enough for quality and speed, but if It happens to have 
significant difference, It can probably be readded.

best regards

On 05/04/2011 12:40 PM, Mark Volz wrote:
>
> Hello,
>
> I was noticed on a mapserver post thatgd/jpegis no longer supported.  
> Forcertaindata I like to use that format because 1) GD is quick and 2) 
> jpeg is compressed soit's agood web format.  Are my assumptions about 
> gd/jpeg wrong?  Are there any current charts thattest the different 
> speeds between the map server format?
>
> Thanks
>
> Mark Volz
>
> GIS Specialist
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> MS4W-Users mailing list
> MS4W-Users at lists.maptools.org
> http://lists.maptools.org/mailman/listinfo/ms4w-users


-- 
----------------------------------------------------------------
Assefa Yewondwossen
Software Analyst

Email: yassefa at dmsolutions.ca
http://www.dmsolutions.ca/

Phone: (613) 565-5056 (ext 14)
Fax:   (613) 565-0925
----------------------------------------------------------------


-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.maptools.org/pipermail/ms4w-users/attachments/20110405/b2b0f4e8/attachment.htm