[Proj] Re: Campo Inchauspe to WGS84 parameters
Frank Warmerdam
warmerdam at pobox.com
Mon Nov 14 00:56:12 EST 2005
On 11/11/05, Noel Zinn <ndzinn at houston.rr.com> wrote:
> Mr. van Vlijmen,
>
> Excellent! The 10-parameter Molodenksy-Badekas transformation is the right
> solution for small areas.
>
> Is it supported by Proj.4?
Noel,
No, I'm afraid not. Not that I am well read, but this is the
first time I had heard of it.
Cliff's points on the dangers of accepting approximate
datum transformations is also well taken. I would however
note that most mappers cannot afford to place geodesists on
the ground. So we scratch around hoping to find something
reasonable.
Best regards,
--
---------------------------------------+--------------------------------------
I set the clouds in motion - turn up | Frank Warmerdam, warmerdam at pobox.com
light and sound - activate the windows | http://pobox.com/~warmerdam
and watch the world go round - Rush | Geospatial Programmer for Rent
More information about the Proj
mailing list