[Proj] Re: Campo Inchauspe to WGS84 parameters

Frank Warmerdam warmerdam at pobox.com
Mon Nov 14 00:56:12 EST 2005

On 11/11/05, Noel Zinn <ndzinn at houston.rr.com> wrote:
> Mr. van Vlijmen,
> Excellent!  The 10-parameter Molodenksy-Badekas transformation is the right
> solution for small areas.
> Is it supported by Proj.4?


No, I'm afraid not.  Not that I am well read, but this is the
first time I had heard of it.

Cliff's points on the dangers of accepting approximate
datum transformations is also well taken.  I would however
note that most mappers cannot afford to place geodesists on
the ground.   So we scratch around hoping to find something

Best regards,
I set the clouds in motion - turn up   | Frank Warmerdam, warmerdam at pobox.com
light and sound - activate the windows | http://pobox.com/~warmerdam
and watch the world go round - Rush    | Geospatial Programmer for Rent

More information about the Proj mailing list