[Proj] Distance calculation
Clifford J Mugnier
cjmce at lsu.edu
Tue Oct 14 16:28:11 EDT 2008
It was Thaddeus Vincenty, not Thomas.
The "exact" solution was published by Dr. Michael E. Pittman in Surveying and Mapping in the early 1980s with Fortran code. Vincenty agreed it was more accurate and pointed out a couple singularities that Pittman later fixed. Pittman's geodesic was adopted by the USAF as the absolute "standard" in which any disagreement with Pittman's inverse showed what error the other method had.
Pittman's direct and inverse geodesic was later reviewed and extensively examined by academics "down under" earlier this year.
From: proj-bounces at lists.maptools.org on behalf of Gerald I. Evenden
Sent: Tue 14-Oct-08 15:14
To: proj at lists.maptools.org
Subject: Re: [Proj] Distance calculation
On Tuesday 14 October 2008 4:04:48 pm Karl Swartz wrote:
> > Zhang Xue-Lian (1985) The nested coefficient method for accurate
> > solutions of direct and inverse geodetic problems with any length.
> > Proceedings of the 7th International Symposium on Geodetic
> > Computations, Direct and inverse distance
> > functions. Cracow, June 18-21, 1985. Institute of
> > Geodesy and Cartography. Wasaw, Poland, ul. Jasna 2/4 pp 747-763
> > since it's more accurate than the classical method due to Gauss for
> > long distances.
> How does this compare to Thomas Vincenty's algorithm (which can be found
> at http://www.ngs.noaa.gov/PUBS_LIB/inverse.pdf)?
> -- Karl
I second the request as I considered it the gold standard and besides full
documentation and source code are available at NGS as well as online
The whole religious complexion of the modern world is due
to the absence from Jerusalem of a lunatic asylum.
-- Havelock Ellis (1859-1939) British psychologist
Proj mailing list
Proj at lists.maptools.org
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the Proj