[Proj] Use of C++

[Kristian Evers]

Perhaps I worded that in a bad way. It is not the time to do line-by-line reviews,
no. At some point it will though, and obviously it will be fruitful to have as many
eyes as possible on the code. For now I was mostly thinking about the architectural
considerations that Even has presented. The point was to focus the energy towards
something productive instead of having a meta-discussion about which tool to use.
Sorry if that didn't come across.

/Kristian

> -----Oprindelig meddelelse-----
> Fra: proj-bounces at lists.maptools.org [mailto:proj-
> bounces at lists.maptools.org] På vegne af Mateusz Loskot
> Sendt: 28. maj 2018 12:28
> Til: PROJ.4 and general Projections Discussions <proj at lists.maptools.org>
> Emne: Re: [Proj] Use of C++
> 
> On 28 May 2018 at 11:39, Kristian Evers <kreve at sdfe.dk> wrote:
> >
> > Anyway, the wheels are in motion and Even has already come a long way
> with his work.
> > Instead of discussing the choice of tools I will instead encourage you all to
> review Evens
> > code and help him build it in the best way possible.
> 
> Has Even already asked for line-by-line review of any of his code [1]?
> AFAIU, the questions were about general aspects of design and
> development.
> I guess, the discussion is/will be going from general to detailed, but
> the latter
> is not yet, unless I've been missed something.
> 
> I don't think it's the right time to go through Even's code with
> thorough review.
> That might be quite distracting during some initial prototyping.
> 
> [1] https://github.com/rouault/proj.4/tree/iso19111 or
> https://github.com/rouault/proj.4/tree/iso19111_ptr
> 
> Best regards,
> --
> Mateusz Loskot, http://mateusz.loskot.net
> _______________________________________________
> Proj mailing list
> Proj at lists.maptools.org
> http://lists.maptools.org/mailman/listinfo/proj