[Shapelib] Re: [Gdal-dev] 1.3.2 Release, OSGeo, etc

Shawn McCann mccann0011 at hotmail.com
Mon Apr 10 23:57:11 EDT 2006


I'd be willing to have a look at the problem this week.

What is your timeline for the gdal release (how much time do we have to 
resolve the issue)?


>From: Frank Warmerdam <warmerdam at pobox.com>
>Reply-To: Shapelib Development <shapelib at lists.maptools.org>
>To: Maciek Sieczka <werchowyna at epf.pl>
>CC: gdal-dev at lists.maptools.org,        Shapelib Development 
><shapelib at lists.maptools.org>
>Subject: [Shapelib] Re: [Gdal-dev] 1.3.2 Release, OSGeo, etc
>Date: Thu, 06 Apr 2006 15:50:13 -0400
>Maciek Sieczka wrote:
>>On Tue, 04 Apr 2006 23:51:11 -0400
>>Frank Warmerdam <warmerdam at pobox.com> wrote:
>>>I am hoping to get a GDAL 1.3.2 release out soon and would appreciate
>>>anyone aware of pressing issues to identify them to me.   I haven't
>>>done much of a pass through bugzilla and at this rate I won't be able
>>>to before the release. But I would like to skim for high priority bug
>>>From my Grass user's point of view, this bug is importatnt:
>>Do you think it will be fixed 1.3.2?
>No, I wasn't expecting to fix it.  The problem is I have to address complex
>type issues (64bit types) in shapelib to fix it, which basically means I
>need to move Shapelib to autoconf and friends.  A substantial transition.
>If someone is interested in taking on shapelib co-maintainership and 
>this I'd seriously consider it.
>Best regards,
>I set the clouds in motion - turn up   | Frank Warmerdam, 
>warmerdam at pobox.com
>light and sound - activate the windows | http://pobox.com/~warmerdam
>and watch the world go round - Rush    | President OSGF, http://osgeo.org
>Shapelib mailing list
>Shapelib at lists.maptools.org

More information about the Shapelib mailing list