[TinyOWS-users] Correct way to give BBOX as KVP with WFS 1.1.0
Rahkonen Jukka
Jukka.Rahkonen at mmmtike.fi
Fri Jul 29 01:28:10 EST 2011
Hi,
Geoserver people consider defaulting WGS84 for BBOX in WFS 1.1.0 insane and they are going to keep the current behaviour which is the same than TinyOWS has. So I think there is no need to change it in TinyOWS either even the standard text really seems to tell the opposite. It might be nice to have a support for the fifth BBOX parameter (crsuri) though.
-Jukka Rahkonen-
Rahkonen Jukka wrote:
> Hi,
>
> This one gives me features:
>
> [1]
> http://hip.latuviitta.org/cgi-bin/tinyows?service=wfs&version=
> 1.1.0&request=GetFeature&typename=lv:municipalities&BBOX=24670
0,6780800,436400,6924000
>
> This one doesn't
> [2]
> http://hip.latuviitta.org/cgi-bin/tinyows?service=wfs&version=
> 1.1.0&request=GetFeature&typename=lv:municipalities&BBOX=24670
0,6780800,436400,6924000,EPSG:3067
>
> The result is an error
> <ows:ExceptionText>Bad parameters for Bbox, must be
> Xmin,Ymin,Xmax,Ymax</ows:ExceptionText></ows:Exception>
>
> However, I am reading from the OGC WFS 1.1.0 standard (OGC 04-094)
>
> 14.3.3 Bounding box
> The bounding box parameter, BBOX, is included in this
> specification for convenience as a shorthand representation
> of the very common a bounding box filter which would be
> expressed in much longer form using XML and the filter
> encoding described in [3]. A BBOX applies to all feature
> types listed in the request.
> The KVP encoding for a bounding box is defined in subclause
> 10.2.3 of normative reference [15]. The general form of the
> parameter is:
> BBOX=lcc1,lcc2,...,lccN,ucc1,ucc2,...uccN[,crsuri]
> where lcc means Lower Corner Coordinate, ucc means Upper
> Corner Coordinate and crsuri means the URI reference to the
> coordinate system being used. This encoding allows N
> coordinates for each corner listed in the order of the
> optional crsuri. If the crsuri is not specified then the 2-D
> coordinates shall be specified using decimal degrees and
> WGS84 as described in [15].
>
> Should I understand this so that my request [2] should give
> me results and that [1], which is a correct WFS 1.0.0 BBOX,
> is not a correct WFS 1.1.0 BBOX because without crsuri BBOX
> should be interpreted to mean a WGS84 box and then obviously
> extents 246700,6780800,436400,6924000 are rather wide?
>
> -Jukka Rahkonen-
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> TinyOWS-users mailing list
> TinyOWS-users at lists.maptools.org
> http://lists.maptools.org/mailman/listinfo/tinyows-users
>
More information about the TinyOWS-users
mailing list