[TinyOWS-users] IsPropertyLike matchCase attribute support
Damon Oehlman
damon.oehlman at sidelab.com
Mon Jun 6 16:47:21 EST 2011
Hey Olivier,
Happy to wait until the next release cycle so you guys can focus on 1.0 :)
I'll send something through in the next few days (hopefully).
Cheers,
Damon.
--
Damon Oehlman - Co-founder
t: DamonOehlman
p: +61 407 542 009
Sidelab Pty Ltd
http://www.sidelab.com/
On Monday, 6 June 2011 at 12:38 AM, Olivier Courtin wrote:
>
> On Jun 1, 2011, at 12:51 PM, Damon Oehlman wrote:
>
> Damon,
>
> (Sorry for the delay, AFK theses previous days...)
>
> > First I just want to say a big thanks to Olivier for creating
> > TinyOWS. I only came across it last night in a search for a
> > lightweight WFS server, and have been extremely impressed with it.
> >
> > We are currently developing a mapping web application for a local
> > client and while we have had Geoserver in the solution stack from
> > the beginning, once we started load testing I felt that we could do
> > better. Coming across the presentation comparing Geoserver,
> > Mapserver and TinyOWS was fantastic and a brilliant introduction to
> > the project.
> >
> > While I can't say for certain, I expect that we will replace
> > Geoserver with TinyOWS for our final solution build.
> >
> > I have already checked out a readonly version of the repo and
> > started making a few tweaks for features that we need in the project
> > (the case insensitive PropertyIsLike via the matchCase attribute for
> > example). This was very simple, given it had already been
> > implemented for other PropertyIs* tag handling.
> >
> > While I'm not a C++ coder (well not for a while now anyway) I'd be
> > happy to submit patch files for review and possible inclusion into
> > TinyOWS. If you can let me know the best way to do this, I'll
> > happily send a patch file through.
>
> Few things;
> - Patch are always welcome, especially when they improve standard
> compliancy,
> performance, or security issues.
>
> - To provide a patch, best way is to modify your own local svn code
> repository then
> send the result, as an attachement to the list, of :
> svn diff
>
> - Right now we are in 1.0 release cycle, so we could include patch
> only if both:
> - It's related to WFS 1.1.0 or 1.0.0 mandatory compliancy, or
> it's a bugfix.
> - you send them that quickly
> Otherwise it will be postponed to the next release...
>
>
> Enjoy using TinyOWS,
>
> --
> Olivier
> _______________________________________________
> TinyOWS-users mailing list
> TinyOWS-users at lists.maptools.org (mailto:TinyOWS-users at lists.maptools.org)
> http://lists.maptools.org/mailman/listinfo/tinyows-users
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.maptools.org/pipermail/tinyows-users/attachments/20110607/36fa5daa/attachment.htm
More information about the TinyOWS-users
mailing list