[TinyOWS-users] IsPropertyLike matchCase attribute support

Damon Oehlman damon.oehlman at sidelab.com
Mon Jun 6 16:47:21 EST 2011


Hey Olivier,

Happy to wait until the next release cycle so you guys can focus on 1.0 :)

I'll send something through in the next few days (hopefully).

Cheers,
Damon.

-- 
Damon Oehlman - Co-founder
t: DamonOehlman
p: +61 407 542 009

Sidelab Pty Ltd
http://www.sidelab.com/


On Monday, 6 June 2011 at 12:38 AM, Olivier Courtin wrote:

> 
> On Jun 1, 2011, at 12:51 PM, Damon Oehlman wrote:
> 
> Damon,
> 
> (Sorry for the delay, AFK theses previous days...)
> 
> > First I just want to say a big thanks to Olivier for creating 
> > TinyOWS. I only came across it last night in a search for a 
> > lightweight WFS server, and have been extremely impressed with it.
> > 
> > We are currently developing a mapping web application for a local 
> > client and while we have had Geoserver in the solution stack from 
> > the beginning, once we started load testing I felt that we could do 
> > better. Coming across the presentation comparing Geoserver, 
> > Mapserver and TinyOWS was fantastic and a brilliant introduction to 
> > the project.
> > 
> > While I can't say for certain, I expect that we will replace 
> > Geoserver with TinyOWS for our final solution build.
> > 
> > I have already checked out a readonly version of the repo and 
> > started making a few tweaks for features that we need in the project 
> > (the case insensitive PropertyIsLike via the matchCase attribute for 
> > example). This was very simple, given it had already been 
> > implemented for other PropertyIs* tag handling.
> > 
> > While I'm not a C++ coder (well not for a while now anyway) I'd be 
> > happy to submit patch files for review and possible inclusion into 
> > TinyOWS. If you can let me know the best way to do this, I'll 
> > happily send a patch file through.
> 
> Few things;
> - Patch are always welcome, especially when they improve standard 
> compliancy,
>  performance, or security issues.
> 
> - To provide a patch, best way is to modify your own local svn code 
> repository then
>  send the result, as an attachement to the list, of :
>  svn diff
> 
> - Right now we are in 1.0 release cycle, so we could include patch 
> only if both:
>  - It's related to WFS 1.1.0 or 1.0.0 mandatory compliancy, or 
> it's a bugfix.
>  - you send them that quickly
>  Otherwise it will be postponed to the next release...
> 
> 
> Enjoy using TinyOWS,
> 
> --
> Olivier
> _______________________________________________
> TinyOWS-users mailing list
> TinyOWS-users at lists.maptools.org (mailto:TinyOWS-users at lists.maptools.org)
> http://lists.maptools.org/mailman/listinfo/tinyows-users

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.maptools.org/pipermail/tinyows-users/attachments/20110607/36fa5daa/attachment.htm 


More information about the TinyOWS-users mailing list