[TinyOWS-users] Tinyows on a huge table
Andrea Peri
aperi2007 at gmail.com
Fri Feb 3 11:57:40 EST 2012
Hi Jukka,
Great !
You has reason.
Using estimated_extent="1" tinyows responde to the getcapabilities.
I has add other tables and it still responde to getcapabilities fast and
without any problem.
Best regards,
Andrea.
2012/2/3 Rahkonen Jukka <Jukka.Rahkonen at mmmtike.fi>
> **
> Hi,
>
> If you have not set estimated_extent="1" then have a try.
>
> estimated_extentOptionalFlag to indicate if TinyOWS should use
> estimated_extent (faster but less accurate). Default is *0*
>
> -Jukka Rahkonen-
>
> ------------------------------
> Andrea Peri wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'm intersect a strange situation.
>
> I' m testing tinyows with a huge DB.
> I start adding thre table to the config.xml.
> And all go ok.
>
> table1 : a table with 287 record only of geometrytype multipolygon.
> table2: a table with 10 records only of geometrytype multipolygon.
> table3: a table with 5.185.512 record of geometrytype polygon.
>
> Until now all is ok. When I open my client wfs I receive correctly the
> list of layers available.
>
> I notice a little more time to respond when add the third table to
> config.xm, but all seem acceptable.
>
> After this I add a fourth table (table4)
>
> The fourth table has 17.077.038 records of geometrytype linestring.
>
> Now tinyows go in trouble.
>
> when I try to ask the getcapabilities from my client wfs it never respond
> and after some time I receive this error
> on my client WFS.
> "invalid name for processing instruction"
>
> After this , I remove from config.xml file the table3 and leave the table4
> .
> so the list in config.xml is
> table1,
> table2,
> table4
> and retry to ask the getcapabilities.
>
> Now it respond and the list was returned to my client wfs.
>
> After this if i retry to re-add the table3.
>
> So the list is
>
> table1,
> table2,
> table4,
> table3
>
> and again the tinyows go in error.
>
> So I guess the tiny has some trouble when the tables has many records.
>
> There is some setting to avoid this or to increment the limit for tinyows ?
>
> thx,
>
>
> --
> -----------------
> Andrea Peri
> . . . . . . . . .
> qwerty àèìòù
> -----------------
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> TinyOWS-users mailing list
> TinyOWS-users at lists.maptools.org
> http://lists.maptools.org/mailman/listinfo/tinyows-users
>
>
--
-----------------
Andrea Peri
. . . . . . . . .
qwerty àèìòù
-----------------
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.maptools.org/pipermail/tinyows-users/attachments/20120203/e6b7d52a/attachment.htm
More information about the TinyOWS-users
mailing list