[Proj] Method to use for getting a set of projections added to the EPSG code list.

[Martin Vermeer]

On Tue, 2006-06-06 at 12:24 -0400, Frank Warmerdam wrote:
> Bob Basques wrote:
> > All,
> > 
> > I was forwarded to this list because of a need to add in some 
> > Projections to the EPSG list.
> > 
> > I would like to have added the seperate County Projections for the State 
> > of Minnesota.
> > 
> > What procedures need to be followed to get something like this moving 
> > ahead?
> 
> Bob,
> 
> You can extend your local proj.4 'epsg' translation file as you wish.
> However, the original EPSG database is not under our control so if you
> want the county projections added to the core EPSG database you will need
> to contact the OGP Surveying and Positioning Committee.
> 
>    http://www.epsg.org/
> 
> I am not keen on adding non-EPSG approved codes into the PROJ.4 epsg
> translation file.

What is the status of the 'world' file under nad? (And why is it under
nad? What is the directory tree logic, if any?)

- Martin

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 191 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
Url : http://lists.maptools.org/pipermail/proj/attachments/20060607/4daa6328/attachment.bin